FKKFY
Price
$14.60
Change
+$1.05 (+7.75%)
Updated
Aug 12 closing price
Capitalization
5.73B
PGNN
Price
$12.00
Change
+$0.15 (+1.27%)
Updated
Aug 12 closing price
Capitalization
54.26M
Interact to see
Advertisement

FKKFY vs PGNN

Header iconFKKFY vs PGNN Comparison
Open Charts FKKFY vs PGNNBanner chart's image
Fukuoka Financial Group
Price$14.60
Change+$1.05 (+7.75%)
Volume$127
Capitalization5.73B
Paragon Financial Solutions, Inc. (TN)
Price$12.00
Change+$0.15 (+1.27%)
Volume$7.37K
Capitalization54.26M
FKKFY vs PGNN Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
FKKFY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PGNN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FKKFY vs. PGNN commentary
Aug 18, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FKKFY is a Buy and PGNN is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 18, 2025
Stock price -- (FKKFY: $14.60 vs. PGNN: $12.00)
Brand notoriety: FKKFY and PGNN are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FKKFY: 14% vs. PGNN: 386%
Market capitalization -- FKKFY: $5.73B vs. PGNN: $54.26M
FKKFY [@Regional Banks] is valued at $5.73B. PGNN’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $54.26M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $174.7B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $7.93B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FKKFY’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whilePGNN’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • FKKFY’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • PGNN’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, FKKFY is a better buy in the long-term than PGNN.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FKKFY’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PGNN’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FKKFY’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • PGNN’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, PGNN is a better buy in the short-term than FKKFY.

Price Growth

FKKFY (@Regional Banks) experienced а +7.75% price change this week, while PGNN (@Regional Banks) price change was +1.27% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +1.64%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.46%, and the average quarterly price growth was +8.68%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+1.64% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FKKFY($5.73B) has a higher market cap than PGNN($54.3M). FKKFY has higher P/E ratio than PGNN: FKKFY (11.26) vs PGNN (8.05). PGNN YTD gains are higher at: 37.931 vs. FKKFY (17.742). PGNN has less debt than FKKFY: PGNN (23.3M) vs FKKFY (7.99T). FKKFY has higher revenues than PGNN: FKKFY (286B) vs PGNN (33.1M).
FKKFYPGNNFKKFY / PGNN
Capitalization5.73B54.3M10,551%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD17.74237.93147%
P/E Ratio11.268.05140%
Revenue286B33.1M864,048%
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt7.99T23.3M34,291,845%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FKKFY vs PGNN: Fundamental Ratings
FKKFY
PGNN
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5030
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
31
Undervalued
37
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
2365
SMR RATING
1..100
158
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4740
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
5087
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FKKFY's Valuation (31) in the null industry is in the same range as PGNN (37). This means that FKKFY’s stock grew similarly to PGNN’s over the last 12 months.

FKKFY's Profit vs Risk Rating (23) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for PGNN (65). This means that FKKFY’s stock grew somewhat faster than PGNN’s over the last 12 months.

FKKFY's SMR Rating (1) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for PGNN (58). This means that FKKFY’s stock grew somewhat faster than PGNN’s over the last 12 months.

PGNN's Price Growth Rating (40) in the null industry is in the same range as FKKFY (47). This means that PGNN’s stock grew similarly to FKKFY’s over the last 12 months.

FKKFY's P/E Growth Rating (50) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for PGNN (87). This means that FKKFY’s stock grew somewhat faster than PGNN’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FKKFYPGNN
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
64%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
6%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
58%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
18%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
61%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
35%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
54%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
36%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
50%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
32%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
50%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
32%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 25 days ago
24%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
60%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
29%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
31%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FKKFY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PGNN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
BBC22.950.38
+1.68%
Virtus LifeSci Biotech Clinical Trls ETF
UFO30.68N/A
+0.01%
Procure Space ETF
DECW32.35N/A
N/A
AllianzIM U.S. Large Cp Buffer20 Dec ETF
ETY15.70-0.09
-0.58%
Eaton Vance Tax-Managed Diversified Equity Income Fund
SOXY52.67-0.93
-1.73%
YieldMax Target 12 Smcndctr Opt Inc ETF

FKKFY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that FKKFY and DBSDF have been poorly correlated (+27% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FKKFY and DBSDF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FKKFY
1D Price
Change %
FKKFY100%
N/A
DBSDF - FKKFY
27%
Poorly correlated
-1.33%
PGNN - FKKFY
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
WSSH - FKKFY
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CBHC - FKKFY
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
WTBFA - FKKFY
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

PGNN and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that PGNN and JPPHY have been poorly correlated (+29% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that PGNN and JPPHY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PGNN
1D Price
Change %
PGNN100%
N/A
JPPHY - PGNN
29%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ELMA - PGNN
22%
Poorly correlated
+3.65%
FKKFY - PGNN
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
TBBC - PGNN
17%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GWBK - PGNN
8%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More