Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FKINX vs RLBGX
FKINX vs RLBGX Comparison
Open Charts FKINX vs RLBGX
Franklin Income A1
Price$2.47
Change-$0.01 (-0.40%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets76.46B
American Funds American Balanced R6
Price$39.59
Change+$0.07 (+0.18%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets268.19B
FKINX vs RLBGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FKINX vs. RLBGX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FKINX is a Buy and RLBGX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBGX has more cash in the bank: 268B vs. FKINX (76.5B). FKINX pays higher dividends than RLBGX: FKINX (5.32) vs RLBGX (2.01). FKINX was incepted earlier than RLBGX: FKINX (77 years) vs RLBGX (17 years). FKINX (0.62) is less costly to investors than RLBGX (0.25). FKINX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 49.72 vs. RLBGX (44.00). RLBGX has a lower initial minimum investment than FKINX: RLBGX (250) vs FKINX (1000). RLBGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.35 vs. FKINX (8.71). FKINX (43.86) and RLBGX (43.37) have equivalent 5 years return.
| FKINX | RLBGX | FKINX / RLBGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.61 | 0.25 | 244% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.62 | 0.25 | 248% |
| Fund Existence | 77 years | 17 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.512 | 16.570 | 63% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 250 | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 76.5B | 268B | 29% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 5.32 | 2.01 | 264% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.71 | 10.35 | 84% |
| Returns for 3 years | 29.29 | 44.95 | 65% |
| Returns for 5 years | 43.86 | 43.37 | 101% |
| Returns for 10 years | 81.35 | 81.84 | 99% |