Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FKIDX vs RERBX
FKIDX vs RERBX Comparison
Open Charts FKIDX vs RERBX
Fidelity Diversified Intl K6
Price$18.78
Change+$1.29 (+7.38%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.17B
American Funds EUPAC R2
Price$59.82
Change-$1.74 (-2.83%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets134.63B
FKIDX vs RERBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FKIDX vs. RERBX commentary
Feb 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FKIDX is a Buy and RERBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RERBX has more cash in the bank: 135B vs. FKIDX (5.17B). RERBX pays higher dividends than FKIDX: RERBX (2.28) vs FKIDX (1.81). FKIDX was incepted earlier than RERBX: FKIDX (9 years) vs RERBX (24 years). RERBX (1.56) is less costly to investors than FKIDX (0.60). FKIDX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 45.00 vs. RERBX (35.00). FKIDX has a lower initial minimum investment than RERBX: FKIDX (0) vs RERBX (250). FKIDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 30.24 vs. RERBX (16.71). FKIDX return over 5 years is better than : 45.16 vs. RERBX (-8.38).
| FKIDX | RERBX | FKIDX / RERBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.60 | 1.56 | 38% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.60 | 1.56 | 38% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.151 | 5.577 | 110% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 5.17B | 135B | 4% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.81 | 2.28 | 79% |
| Returns for 1 year | 30.24 | 16.71 | 181% |
| Returns for 3 years | 55.46 | 21.65 | 256% |
| Returns for 5 years | 45.16 | -8.38 | -539% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 57.22 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement