Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FKGRX vs RGACX
FKGRX vs RGACX Comparison
Open Charts FKGRX vs RGACX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R3
Price$84.36
Change+$0.32 (+0.38%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets336.88B
FKGRX vs RGACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FKGRX vs. RGACX commentary
Sep 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FKGRX is a Buy and RGACX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 337B vs. FKGRX (18.2B). RGACX pays higher dividends than FKGRX: RGACX (0.07) vs FKGRX (0.03). FKGRX was incepted earlier than RGACX: FKGRX (78 years) vs RGACX (23 years). RGACX (0.94) is less costly to investors than FKGRX (0.79). RGACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. FKGRX (7.35). RGACX has a lower initial minimum investment than FKGRX: RGACX (250) vs FKGRX (1000). RGACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.22 vs. FKGRX (2.73). RGACX return over 5 years is better than : 45.63 vs. FKGRX (17.66).
| FKGRX | RGACX | FKGRX / RGACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.79 | 0.94 | 84% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.79 | 0.94 | 84% |
| Fund Existence | 78 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.169 | 17.183 | 71% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 18.2B | 337B | 5% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.03 | 0.07 | 48% |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.73 | 12.22 | 22% |
| Returns for 3 years | 40.30 | 71.26 | 57% |
| Returns for 5 years | 17.66 | 45.63 | 39% |
| Returns for 10 years | 111.50 | 111.15 | 100% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement