Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FKEMX vs RNWFX
FKEMX vs RNWFX Comparison
Open Charts FKEMX vs RNWFX
Fidelity Emerging Markets K
Price$49.01
Change+$0.01 (+0.02%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets8.98B
American Funds New World R5
Price$97.91
Change+$0.16 (+0.16%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets75.3B
FKEMX vs RNWFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FKEMX vs. RNWFX commentary
Dec 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FKEMX is a Hold and RNWFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWFX has more cash in the bank: 75.3B vs. FKEMX (8.98B). RNWFX pays higher dividends than FKEMX: RNWFX (0.95) vs FKEMX (0.61). FKEMX was incepted earlier than RNWFX: FKEMX (18 years) vs RNWFX (24 years). FKEMX (0.74) is less costly to investors than RNWFX (0.62). FKEMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 46.00 vs. RNWFX (37.00). FKEMX has a lower initial minimum investment than RNWFX: FKEMX (0) vs RNWFX (250). FKEMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 25.98 vs. RNWFX (20.19). RNWFX return over 5 years is better than : 19.35 vs. FKEMX (14.79).
| FKEMX | RNWFX | FKEMX / RNWFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.74 | 0.62 | 119% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.74 | 0.62 | 119% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 28.519 | 25.964 | 110% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 8.98B | 75.3B | 12% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.61 | 0.95 | 64% |
| Returns for 1 year | 25.98 | 20.19 | 129% |
| Returns for 3 years | 52.15 | 43.87 | 119% |
| Returns for 5 years | 14.79 | 19.35 | 76% |
| Returns for 10 years | 131.45 | 96.17 | 137% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers