Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FKDNX vs RGACX
FKDNX vs RGACX Comparison
Open Charts FKDNX vs RGACX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R3
Price$82.10
Change-$0.06 (-0.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets329.22B
FKDNX vs RGACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FKDNX vs. RGACX commentary
Aug 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FKDNX is a Buy and RGACX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 329B vs. FKDNX (28.4B). RGACX pays higher dividends than FKDNX: RGACX (0.07) vs FKDNX (0.00). FKDNX was incepted earlier than RGACX: FKDNX (58 years) vs RGACX (23 years). RGACX (0.94) is less costly to investors than FKDNX (0.79). RGACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. FKDNX (11.94). RGACX has a lower initial minimum investment than FKDNX: RGACX (250) vs FKDNX (1000). FKDNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 22.40 vs. RGACX (14.08). FKDNX return over 5 years is better than : 71.21 vs. RGACX (41.95).
| FKDNX | RGACX | FKDNX / RGACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.79 | 0.94 | 84% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.79 | 0.94 | 84% |
| Fund Existence | 58 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.123 | 14.044 | 101% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 28.4B | 329B | 9% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.07 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 22.40 | 14.08 | 159% |
| Returns for 3 years | 70.90 | 41.19 | 172% |
| Returns for 5 years | 71.21 | 41.95 | 170% |
| Returns for 10 years | 293.35 | 83.68 | 351% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers