Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FKCSX vs WCMNX
FKCSX vs WCMNX Comparison
Open Charts FKCSX vs WCMNX
Federated Hermes Kaufmann Small Cap C
Price$41.56
Change+$0.09 (+0.22%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets3.22B
WCM Small Cap Growth Investor
Price$13.65
Change+$0.01 (+0.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets43.69M
FKCSX vs WCMNX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FKCSX vs. WCMNX commentary
Dec 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FKCSX is a Buy and WCMNX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FKCSX has more cash in the bank: 3.22B vs. WCMNX (43.7M). FKCSX pays higher dividends than WCMNX: FKCSX (0.69) vs WCMNX (0.00). FKCSX was incepted earlier than WCMNX: FKCSX (23 years) vs WCMNX (6 years). WCMNX (2.04) and FKCSX (2.02) have similar cost to investors . WCMNX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 83.00 vs. FKCSX (34.00). WCMNX has a lower initial minimum investment than FKCSX: WCMNX (1000) vs FKCSX (1500). WCMNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -1.37 vs. FKCSX (-4.19). WCMNX return over 5 years is better than : 0.74 vs. FKCSX (-15.09).
| FKCSX | WCMNX | FKCSX / WCMNX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.02 | 1.24 | 163% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.02 | 2.04 | 99% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.913 | 7.486 | 132% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1500 | 1000 | 150% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.22B | 43.7M | 7,375% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.69 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -4.19 | -1.37 | 305% |
| Returns for 3 years | 20.46 | 21.03 | 97% |
| Returns for 5 years | -15.09 | 0.74 | -2,043% |
| Returns for 10 years | 93.70 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement