Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FKACX vs RGEBX
FKACX vs RGEBX Comparison
Open Charts FKACX vs RGEBX
Franklin Growth Opportunities C
Price$32.31
Change-$0.40 (-1.22%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets4.51B
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R2E
Price$74.89
Change-$0.91 (-1.20%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets306.22B
FKACX vs RGEBX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FKACX vs. RGEBX commentary
Jun 16, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FKACX is a Buy and RGEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGEBX has more cash in the bank: 306B vs. FKACX (4.51B). FKACX (0.00) and RGEBX (0.00) have matching dividends . FKACX was incepted earlier than RGEBX: FKACX (26 years) vs RGEBX (11 years). FKACX (1.66) is less costly to investors than RGEBX (1.09). FKACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 27.49 vs. RGEBX (25.00). RGEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than FKACX: RGEBX (250) vs FKACX (1000). RGEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.68 vs. FKACX (-6.59). RGEBX return over 5 years is better than : 45.42 vs. FKACX (-5.99).
| FKACX | RGEBX | FKACX / RGEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.66 | 1.09 | 152% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.66 | 1.09 | 152% |
| Fund Existence | 26 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.874 | 4.829 | 18% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 4.51B | 306B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -6.59 | 7.68 | -86% |
| Returns for 3 years | 16.77 | 51.01 | 33% |
| Returns for 5 years | -5.99 | 45.42 | -13% |
| Returns for 10 years | 8.20 | 65.87 | 12% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement