Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FKACX vs RGEBX
FKACX vs RGEBX Comparison
Open Charts FKACX vs RGEBX
Franklin Growth Opportunities C
Price$34.03
Change+$0.16 (+0.47%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets4.71B
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R2E
Price$80.73
Change+$0.27 (+0.34%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets328.1B
FKACX vs RGEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FKACX vs. RGEBX commentary
Jul 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FKACX is a Buy and RGEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGEBX has more cash in the bank: 328B vs. FKACX (4.71B). FKACX (0.00) and RGEBX (0.00) have matching dividends . FKACX was incepted earlier than RGEBX: FKACX (26 years) vs RGEBX (11 years). FKACX (1.66) is less costly to investors than RGEBX (1.09). FKACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 27.59 vs. RGEBX (25.00). RGEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than FKACX: RGEBX (250) vs FKACX (1000). RGEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 16.90 vs. FKACX (0.77). RGEBX return over 5 years is better than : 45.14 vs. FKACX (-9.83).
| FKACX | RGEBX | FKACX / RGEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.66 | 1.09 | 152% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.66 | 1.09 | 152% |
| Fund Existence | 26 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.244 | 13.004 | 48% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 4.71B | 328B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.77 | 16.90 | 5% |
| Returns for 3 years | 14.50 | 55.95 | 26% |
| Returns for 5 years | -9.83 | 45.14 | -22% |
| Returns for 10 years | 11.14 | 78.81 | 14% |