Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FKACX vs RGAHX
FKACX vs RGAHX Comparison
Open Charts FKACX vs RGAHX
Franklin Growth Opportunities C
Price$33.79
Change+$0.40 (+1.20%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets4.69B
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R5E
Price$81.72
Change+$0.80 (+0.99%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets322.86B
FKACX vs RGAHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FKACX vs. RGAHX commentary
Jul 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FKACX is a Buy and RGAHX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAHX has more cash in the bank: 323B vs. FKACX (4.7B). RGAHX pays higher dividends than FKACX: RGAHX (0.47) vs FKACX (0.00). FKACX was incepted earlier than RGAHX: FKACX (26 years) vs RGAHX (10 years). FKACX (1.66) is less costly to investors than RGAHX (0.44). FKACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 27.49 vs. RGAHX (25.00). RGAHX has a lower initial minimum investment than FKACX: RGAHX (250) vs FKACX (1000). RGAHX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.98 vs. FKACX (-5.46). RGAHX return over 5 years is better than : 50.13 vs. FKACX (-8.23).
| FKACX | RGAHX | FKACX / RGAHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.66 | 0.44 | 377% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.66 | 0.44 | 377% |
| Fund Existence | 26 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.495 | 11.275 | 49% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 4.7B | 323B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.47 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -5.46 | 10.98 | -50% |
| Returns for 3 years | 17.00 | 60.14 | 28% |
| Returns for 5 years | -8.23 | 50.13 | -16% |
| Returns for 10 years | 13.73 | N/A | - |