Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FKACX vs RGACX
FKACX vs RGACX Comparison
Open Charts FKACX vs RGACX
Franklin Growth Opportunities C
Price$34.34
Change-$0.01 (-0.03%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets4.72B
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R3
Price$83.16
Change+$0.19 (+0.23%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets332.38B
FKACX vs RGACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FKACX vs. RGACX commentary
Sep 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FKACX is a Buy and RGACX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 332B vs. FKACX (4.72B). RGACX pays higher dividends than FKACX: RGACX (0.07) vs FKACX (0.00). FKACX was incepted earlier than RGACX: FKACX (26 years) vs RGACX (23 years). FKACX (1.66) is less costly to investors than RGACX (0.94). FKACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 27.59 vs. RGACX (25.00). RGACX has a lower initial minimum investment than FKACX: RGACX (250) vs FKACX (1000). RGACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 17.83 vs. FKACX (-0.72). RGACX return over 5 years is better than : 40.02 vs. FKACX (-14.02).
| FKACX | RGACX | FKACX / RGACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.66 | 0.94 | 177% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.66 | 0.94 | 177% |
| Fund Existence | 26 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.212 | 15.516 | 46% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 4.72B | 332B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.07 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -0.72 | 17.83 | -4% |
| Returns for 3 years | 14.81 | 58.53 | 25% |
| Returns for 5 years | -14.02 | 40.02 | -35% |
| Returns for 10 years | 18.50 | 95.93 | 19% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers