FJLLF
Price
$14.75
Change
-$2.38 (-13.89%)
Updated
Apr 9 closing price
Capitalization
147.88M
WDS
Price
$17.50
Change
-$0.08 (-0.46%)
Updated
Aug 15 closing price
Capitalization
33.36B
65 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

FJLLF vs WDS

Header iconFJLLF vs WDS Comparison
Open Charts FJLLF vs WDSBanner chart's image
Fuji Oil Holdings
Price$14.75
Change-$2.38 (-13.89%)
Volume$300
Capitalization147.88M
Woodside Energy Group
Price$17.50
Change-$0.08 (-0.46%)
Volume$584.96K
Capitalization33.36B
FJLLF vs WDS Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
WDS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FJLLF vs. WDS commentary
Aug 18, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FJLLF is a Hold and WDS is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 18, 2025
Stock price -- (FJLLF: $14.75 vs. WDS: $17.50)
Brand notoriety: FJLLF and WDS are both not notable
FJLLF represents the Oil Refining/Marketing, while WDS is part of the Oil & Gas Production industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FJLLF: 100% vs. WDS: 70%
Market capitalization -- FJLLF: $147.88M vs. WDS: $33.36B
FJLLF [@Oil Refining/Marketing] is valued at $147.88M. WDS’s [@Oil & Gas Production] market capitalization is $33.36B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Oil Refining/Marketing] industry ranges from $49.95B to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Oil & Gas Production] industry ranges from $119.06B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Oil Refining/Marketing] industry is $6.74B. The average market capitalization across the [@Oil & Gas Production] industry is $3.75B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FJLLF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileWDS’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • FJLLF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • WDS’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, WDS is a better buy in the long-term than FJLLF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

WDS’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • WDS’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.

Price Growth

FJLLF (@Oil Refining/Marketing) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while WDS (@Oil & Gas Production) price change was +0.46% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Oil Refining/Marketing industry was +1.55%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.60%, and the average quarterly price growth was +7.99%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Oil & Gas Production industry was +0.17%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.27%, and the average quarterly price growth was +2.72%.

Reported Earning Dates

WDS is expected to report earnings on Oct 22, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Oil Refining/Marketing (+1.55% weekly)

The Oil Refining/Marketing segment includes companies that refine crude oil into a number of petroleum products, including gasoline, jet fuel and diesel, and then sell the usable products to the end users. These companies are involved in what’s called downstream operations in the oil business. They also engage in the marketing and distribution of crude oil and natural gas products. In other words, the downstream oil and gas business is focused on post-production processes of crude oil and natural gas. When oil prices slump, downstream businesses are hurt less or in some cases even benefit, since their purchase cost of crude oil goes down. Some of the biggest U.S. oil refining/marketing companies include Phillips 66, Marathon Petroleum Corporation and Valero Energy Corp.

@Oil & Gas Production (+0.17% weekly)

The oil and gas production segment includes companies that specialize in exploration, development, and production of oil and natural gas. These companies are focused on upstream operations. Companies typically identify deposits, drill wells, and extract raw materials from underground. The industry also includes related services like rig operations, feasibility studies, machinery rentals etc. Several operators in this industry work with various types of contractors such as engineering procurement and construction contractors, as well as with joint-venture partners and oil field service companies. Oil and gas often involves large fixed costs of production; so, declining crude oil prices, for example, is a potential negative for this industry. Conoco Phillips, EOG Resources, Inc. and Pioneer Natural Resources Company are some examples of companies operating in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
WDS($33.4B) has a higher market cap than FJLLF($148M). FJLLF has higher P/E ratio than WDS: FJLLF (11.84) vs WDS (9.36). WDS YTD gains are higher at: 16.263 vs. FJLLF (0.000).
FJLLFWDSFJLLF / WDS
Capitalization148M33.4B0%
EBITDAN/A9.47B-
Gain YTD0.00016.263-
P/E Ratio11.849.36126%
RevenueN/A13.2B-
Total CashN/A4.11B-
Total DebtN/A11.6B-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
WDS: Fundamental Ratings
WDS
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
50
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
13
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
58
SMR RATING
1..100
93
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
44
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
95
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
WDS
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
67%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
63%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
62%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
65%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
57%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
58%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
58%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
66%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
57%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
61%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
WDS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
CRWL28.890.35
+1.23%
GraniteShares 2x Long CRWD Daily ETF
EPU52.190.24
+0.47%
iShares MSCI Peru ETF
IYT70.520.23
+0.33%
iShares Transportation Average ETF
IGM118.07-0.53
-0.45%
iShares Expanded Tech Sector ETF
SPXV70.72-0.40
-0.56%
ProShares S&P 500® ex-Health Care

FJLLF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that FJLLF and MXC have been poorly correlated (+32% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FJLLF and MXC's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FJLLF
1D Price
Change %
FJLLF100%
N/A
MXC - FJLLF
32%
Poorly correlated
-0.61%
GPOR - FJLLF
2%
Poorly correlated
+0.16%
KGEI - FJLLF
1%
Poorly correlated
+0.71%
REPX - FJLLF
-0%
Poorly correlated
-1.80%
WDS - FJLLF
-0%
Poorly correlated
-0.46%
More

WDS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, WDS has been loosely correlated with HES. These tickers have moved in lockstep 64% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if WDS jumps, then HES could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To WDS
1D Price
Change %
WDS100%
-0.46%
HES - WDS
64%
Loosely correlated
N/A
VET - WDS
63%
Loosely correlated
-1.64%
FANG - WDS
62%
Loosely correlated
-0.39%
CHRD - WDS
62%
Loosely correlated
-0.68%
CNQ - WDS
62%
Loosely correlated
+0.17%
More