FJLLF
Price
$14.75
Change
-$2.38 (-13.89%)
Updated
Apr 9 closing price
Capitalization
163.9M
MXC
Price
$9.00
Change
-$0.21 (-2.28%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
20.93M
Interact to see
Advertisement

FJLLF vs MXC

Header iconFJLLF vs MXC Comparison
Open Charts FJLLF vs MXCBanner chart's image
Fuji Oil Holdings
Price$14.75
Change-$2.38 (-13.89%)
Volume$300
Capitalization163.9M
Mexco Energy
Price$9.00
Change-$0.21 (-2.28%)
Volume$24.52K
Capitalization20.93M
FJLLF vs MXC Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
MXC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FJLLF vs. MXC commentary
Jul 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FJLLF is a Hold and MXC is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 06, 2025
Stock price -- (FJLLF: $14.75 vs. MXC: $9.00)
Brand notoriety: FJLLF and MXC are both not notable
Both companies represent the Oil & Gas Production industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FJLLF: 100% vs. MXC: 67%
Market capitalization -- FJLLF: $163.9M vs. MXC: $20.93M
FJLLF [@Oil & Gas Production] is valued at $163.9M. MXC’s [@Oil & Gas Production] market capitalization is $20.93M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Oil & Gas Production] industry ranges from $151.38B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Oil & Gas Production] industry is $4.27B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FJLLF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileMXC’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • FJLLF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • MXC’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, MXC is a better buy in the long-term than FJLLF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

MXC’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • MXC’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.

Price Growth

FJLLF (@Oil & Gas Production) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while MXC (@Oil & Gas Production) price change was -4.46% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Oil & Gas Production industry was +0.44%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +8.65%, and the average quarterly price growth was +6.54%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Oil & Gas Production (+0.44% weekly)

The oil and gas production segment includes companies that specialize in exploration, development, and production of oil and natural gas. These companies are focused on upstream operations. Companies typically identify deposits, drill wells, and extract raw materials from underground. The industry also includes related services like rig operations, feasibility studies, machinery rentals etc. Several operators in this industry work with various types of contractors such as engineering procurement and construction contractors, as well as with joint-venture partners and oil field service companies. Oil and gas often involves large fixed costs of production; so, declining crude oil prices, for example, is a potential negative for this industry. Conoco Phillips, EOG Resources, Inc. and Pioneer Natural Resources Company are some examples of companies operating in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FJLLF($164M) has a higher market cap than MXC($20.9M). FJLLF has higher P/E ratio than MXC: FJLLF (26.53) vs MXC (12.85). FJLLF YTD gains are higher at: 0.000 vs. MXC (-19.020). FJLLF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 17.2B vs. MXC (4.3M). FJLLF has more cash in the bank: 12.8B vs. MXC (3.58M). MXC has less debt than FJLLF: MXC (33.6K) vs FJLLF (158B). FJLLF has higher revenues than MXC: FJLLF (850B) vs MXC (7.01M).
FJLLFMXCFJLLF / MXC
Capitalization164M20.9M785%
EBITDA17.2B4.3M400,186%
Gain YTD0.000-19.020-
P/E Ratio26.5312.85206%
Revenue850B7.01M12,120,348%
Total Cash12.8B3.58M357,642%
Total Debt158B33.6K470,238,095%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
MXC: Fundamental Ratings
MXC
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
50
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
46
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
80
SMR RATING
1..100
78
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
47
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
92
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
95

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
MXC
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
76%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
77%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
73%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
79%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
80%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
71%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
87%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
81%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
MXC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
LLYVK81.611.36
+1.69%
Liberty Media Corp
HPP2.720.03
+1.12%
Hudson Pacific Properties
OXSQ2.260.02
+0.89%
Oxford Square Capital Corp
MTR5.670.04
+0.74%
Mesa Royalty Trust
EXC43.130.21
+0.49%
Exelon Corp

FJLLF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that FJLLF and MXC have been poorly correlated (+32% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FJLLF and MXC's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FJLLF
1D Price
Change %
FJLLF100%
N/A
MXC - FJLLF
32%
Poorly correlated
-2.28%
GPOR - FJLLF
2%
Poorly correlated
+0.04%
KGEI - FJLLF
1%
Poorly correlated
+2.18%
REPX - FJLLF
-0%
Poorly correlated
-0.44%
WDS - FJLLF
-0%
Poorly correlated
-0.32%
More

MXC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MXC has been loosely correlated with HUSA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 58% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MXC jumps, then HUSA could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MXC
1D Price
Change %
MXC100%
-2.28%
HUSA - MXC
58%
Loosely correlated
-8.54%
USEG - MXC
50%
Loosely correlated
N/A
INDO - MXC
45%
Loosely correlated
-2.77%
BRN - MXC
34%
Loosely correlated
+1.77%
FJLLF - MXC
32%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More