Advertisement
FIZZ vs MNST
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FIZZ is a Hold and MNST is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
FIZZ’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileMNST’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).
- FIZZ’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- MNST’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
FIZZ’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MNST’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).
- FIZZ’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 2 bearish.
- MNST’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.
Price Growth
FIZZ (@Beverages: Non-Alcoholic) experienced а -1.97% price change this week, while MNST (@Beverages: Non-Alcoholic) price change was +3.85% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Beverages: Non-Alcoholic industry was +1.25%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.71%, and the average quarterly price growth was +10.63%.
Reported Earning Dates
FIZZ is expected to report earnings on Dec 04, 2025.
MNST is expected to report earnings on Feb 26, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Beverages: Non-Alcoholic (+1.25% weekly)Non-alcoholic drinks include traces of alcohol or low alcohol content or without alcohol or alcohol removed. Functional Beverages, Carbonated Soft Drinks (CSDs), Sports Drinks, Fruit Beverages, and Bottled Water are some common types of non-alcoholic beverages. The largest segment in this market is soft drinks (think Pepsi and Coke). Many established companies in this space have also been stepping up production of low to zero-calorie varieties in recent years, to cater to a rising number of health-conscious consumers. Coca-Cola Company, Pepsico Inc, Keurig Dr Pepper Inc. and Monster Beverage Corporation are some major non-alcoholic beverage makers.
| FIZZ | MNST | FIZZ / MNST | |
| Capitalization | 3.07B | 68.9B | 4% |
| EBITDA | 258M | 2.16B | 12% |
| Gain YTD | -23.037 | 34.094 | -68% |
| P/E Ratio | 16.59 | 40.05 | 41% |
| Revenue | 1.2B | 7.66B | 16% |
| Total Cash | 250M | 2.07B | 12% |
| Total Debt | 69.9M | 199M | 35% |
FIZZ | MNST | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 4 | 85 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 93 Overvalued | 91 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 24 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 20 | 39 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 85 | 26 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 85 | 31 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 75 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
MNST's Valuation (91) in the Beverages Non Alcoholic industry is in the same range as FIZZ (93). This means that MNST’s stock grew similarly to FIZZ’s over the last 12 months.
MNST's Profit vs Risk Rating (24) in the Beverages Non Alcoholic industry is significantly better than the same rating for FIZZ (100). This means that MNST’s stock grew significantly faster than FIZZ’s over the last 12 months.
FIZZ's SMR Rating (20) in the Beverages Non Alcoholic industry is in the same range as MNST (39). This means that FIZZ’s stock grew similarly to MNST’s over the last 12 months.
MNST's Price Growth Rating (26) in the Beverages Non Alcoholic industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FIZZ (85). This means that MNST’s stock grew somewhat faster than FIZZ’s over the last 12 months.
MNST's P/E Growth Rating (31) in the Beverages Non Alcoholic industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FIZZ (85). This means that MNST’s stock grew somewhat faster than FIZZ’s over the last 12 months.
| FIZZ | MNST | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 50% | 2 days ago 54% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 58% | 2 days ago 44% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 66% | 2 days ago 52% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 62% | 2 days ago 57% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 65% | 2 days ago 56% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 64% | 2 days ago 51% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 9 days ago 65% | 3 days ago 56% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 17 days ago 64% | 17 days ago 48% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 73% | 2 days ago 75% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 64% | 2 days ago 49% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| MFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| DINIX | 24.63 | 0.18 | +0.74% |
| BNY Mellon International Stock Index I | |||
| SBHSX | 14.63 | 0.08 | +0.55% |
| Segall Bryant & Hamill Intl Sm Cp Ret | |||
| FNITX | 45.14 | N/A | N/A |
| Fidelity Advisor New Insights M | |||
| QUACX | 76.57 | -0.08 | -0.10% |
| AB Small Cap Growth C | |||
| WBSRX | 35.40 | -0.10 | -0.28% |
| William Blair Small Cap Growth R6 | |||
FIZZ and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FIZZ has been loosely correlated with PEP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 43% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FIZZ jumps, then PEP could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FIZZ | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FIZZ | 100% | -2.38% | ||
| PEP - FIZZ | 43% Loosely correlated | -0.48% | ||
| KDP - FIZZ | 42% Loosely correlated | +0.64% | ||
| KO - FIZZ | 36% Loosely correlated | -0.14% | ||
| MNST - FIZZ | 36% Loosely correlated | -1.99% | ||
| COCO - FIZZ | 26% Poorly correlated | +3.06% | ||
More | ||||
MNST and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MNST has been loosely correlated with PEP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 49% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MNST jumps, then PEP could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To MNST | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MNST | 100% | -1.99% | ||
| PEP - MNST | 49% Loosely correlated | -0.48% | ||
| CCEP - MNST | 45% Loosely correlated | +0.15% | ||
| KO - MNST | 43% Loosely correlated | -0.14% | ||
| KDP - MNST | 40% Loosely correlated | +0.64% | ||
| FIZZ - MNST | 34% Loosely correlated | -2.38% | ||
More | ||||