Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FIWGX vs JHBSX
FIWGX vs JHBSX Comparison
Open Charts FIWGX vs JHBSX
Strategic Advisers Fidelity Core
Price$9.29
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets86.16B
JHancock Bond R6
Price$13.74
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets26.94B
FIWGX vs JHBSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FIWGX vs. JHBSX commentary
Dec 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FIWGX is a Hold and JHBSX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FIWGX has more cash in the bank: 86.2B vs. JHBSX (26.9B). JHBSX pays higher dividends than FIWGX: JHBSX (4.55) vs FIWGX (4.25). FIWGX was incepted earlier than JHBSX: FIWGX (7 years) vs JHBSX (14 years). FIWGX (0.41) is less costly to investors than JHBSX (0.36). FIWGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 207.00 vs. JHBSX (100.00). FIWGX has a lower initial minimum investment than JHBSX: FIWGX (0) vs JHBSX (1000000). JHBSX (7.56) and FIWGX (7.47) have marching annual gain over last year. JHBSX return over 5 years is better than : 0.34 vs. FIWGX (-2.54).
| FIWGX | JHBSX | FIWGX / JHBSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.16 | 0.35 | 46% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.41 | 0.36 | 114% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.921 | 6.973 | 99% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 86.2B | 26.9B | 320% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 4.25 | 4.55 | 93% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.47 | 7.56 | 99% |
| Returns for 3 years | 16.51 | 16.91 | 98% |
| Returns for 5 years | -2.54 | 0.34 | -743% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 30.17 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers