Advertisement
FITGF vs HROEY
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FITGF is a Hold and HROEY is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
FITGF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileHROEY’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
- FITGF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- HROEY’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
FITGF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while HROEY’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
- FITGF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
- HROEY’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
FITGF (@Electronic Components) experienced а -3.48% price change this week, while HROEY (@Electronic Components) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Electronic Components industry was +0.51%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +6.86%, and the average quarterly price growth was +2.81%.
Industries' Descriptions
@Electronic Components (+0.51% weekly)The Electronic Components industry produces electronic equipment for industries and consumer electronics products, such as mobile devices, televisions, and circuit boards. TE Connectivity Ltd, for example, is a company that designs and manufactures connectivity and sensor products for harsh environments in various industries, such as automotive, industrial equipment, aerospace, and oil & gas. Another major player, Corning Inc., makes advanced optics including end-to-end fiber and wireless solutions for communications networks along with various other technologies catering to industrial and scientific applications.
| FITGF | HROEY | FITGF / HROEY | |
| Capitalization | 2.2B | 3.97B | 56% |
| EBITDA | N/A | 61.1B | - |
| Gain YTD | -38.770 | -5.833 | 665% |
| P/E Ratio | 13.56 | 16.60 | 82% |
| Revenue | N/A | 177B | - |
| Total Cash | N/A | 159B | - |
| Total Debt | N/A | 5.65B | - |
| FITGF | HROEY | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 90% | 5 days ago 36% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 88% | 5 days ago 25% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 90% | 5 days ago 26% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 89% | 5 days ago 38% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 89% | 5 days ago 22% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 87% | 5 days ago 21% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 90% | 5 days ago 29% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 90% | 5 days ago 19% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| ILDR | 29.59 | 0.47 | +1.62% |
| First Trust Innovation Leaders ETF | |||
| SDOG | 59.14 | 0.09 | +0.15% |
| ALPS Sector Dividend Dogs ETF | |||
| CAF | 13.80 | 0.02 | +0.15% |
| Morgan Stanley China A Share Fund | |||
| HOCT | 23.86 | N/A | N/A |
| Innovator Premium Income 9 Buf ETF - Oct | |||
| DECP | 27.73 | N/A | N/A |
| PGIM S&P 500 Buffer 12 ETF - Dec | |||
FITGF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that FITGF and OST have been poorly correlated (+16% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FITGF and OST's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FITGF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FITGF | 100% | N/A | ||
| OST - FITGF | 16% Poorly correlated | +27.69% | ||
| OUST - FITGF | 10% Poorly correlated | +6.21% | ||
| MTEK - FITGF | 7% Poorly correlated | -5.33% | ||
| BYDIY - FITGF | 7% Poorly correlated | +2.88% | ||
| HROEY - FITGF | 7% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||
HROEY and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that HROEY and BCNAY have been poorly correlated (+32% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that HROEY and BCNAY's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To HROEY | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| HROEY | 100% | N/A | ||
| BCNAY - HROEY | 32% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| FITGF - HROEY | 7% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| MTEK - HROEY | 5% Poorly correlated | -5.33% | ||
| OUST - HROEY | 3% Poorly correlated | +6.21% | ||
| HPHTY - HROEY | 2% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||