FITGF vs HROEY
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FITGF is a Hold and HROEY is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
FITGF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileHROEY’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- FITGF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- HROEY’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Price Growth
FITGF (@Electronic Components) experienced а +25.56% price change this week, while HROEY (@Electronic Components) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Electronic Components industry was -0.89%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.32%, and the average quarterly price growth was +5.60%.
Industries' Descriptions
@Electronic Components (-0.89% weekly)The Electronic Components industry produces electronic equipment for industries and consumer electronics products, such as mobile devices, televisions, and circuit boards. TE Connectivity Ltd, for example, is a company that designs and manufactures connectivity and sensor products for harsh environments in various industries, such as automotive, industrial equipment, aerospace, and oil & gas. Another major player, Corning Inc., makes advanced optics including end-to-end fiber and wireless solutions for communications networks along with various other technologies catering to industrial and scientific applications.
| FITGF | HROEY | FITGF / HROEY | |
| Capitalization | 2.6B | 3.86B | 67% |
| EBITDA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Gain YTD | 154.188 | -1.367 | -11,278% |
| P/E Ratio | 16.88 | 19.27 | 88% |
| Revenue | N/A | N/A | - |
| Total Cash | N/A | N/A | - |
| Total Debt | N/A | N/A | - |
| RSI ODDS (%) |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) |
| Momentum ODDS (%) |
| MACD ODDS (%) |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) |
| Advances ODDS (%) |
| Declines ODDS (%) |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) |
| Aroon ODDS (%) |
FITGF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that FITGF and OST have been poorly correlated (+16% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FITGF and OST's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FITGF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FITGF | 100% | -0.04% | ||
| OST - FITGF | 16% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| OUST - FITGF | 10% Poorly correlated | -4.50% | ||
| MTEK - FITGF | 7% Poorly correlated | -2.69% | ||
| BYDIY - FITGF | 7% Poorly correlated | -1.21% | ||
| HROEY - FITGF | 7% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||
HROEY and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that HROEY and BCNAY have been poorly correlated (+32% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that HROEY and BCNAY's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To HROEY | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| HROEY | 100% | N/A | ||
| BCNAY - HROEY | 32% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| FITGF - HROEY | 7% Poorly correlated | -0.04% | ||
| MTEK - HROEY | 5% Poorly correlated | -2.69% | ||
| OUST - HROEY | 3% Poorly correlated | -4.50% | ||
| HPHTY - HROEY | 2% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||