Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FITE vs XLK
FITE vs XLK Comparison
Open Charts FITE vs XLK
Stt Strt® SPDR® S&PKenshoFutSecETF
Price$95.64
Change+$0.70 (+0.74%)
Volume$5.83K
Net Assets111.01M
State Street®TechSelSectSPDR®ETF
Price$144.70
Change-$1.78 (-1.22%)
Volume$22.1M
Net Assets93.85B
FITE vs XLK Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FITE vs. XLK commentary
Jan 15, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FITE is a Hold and XLK is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
XLK has more net assets: 93.9B vs. FITE (111M). FITE has a higher annual dividend yield than XLK: FITE (12.082) vs XLK (0.507). FITE was incepted earlier than XLK: FITE (8 years) vs XLK (27 years). XLK (0.08) has a lower expense ratio than FITE (0.45). FITE has a higher turnover XLK (5.00) vs XLK (5.00).
| FITE | XLK | FITE / XLK | |
| Gain YTD | 12.082 | 0.507 | 2,383% |
| Net Assets | 111M | 93.9B | 0% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.45 | 0.08 | 563% |
| Turnover | 22.00 | 5.00 | 440% |
| Yield | 0.23 | 0.54 | 42% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 27 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| FITE | XLK | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 81% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 78% | 1 day ago 87% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 83% | 1 day ago 83% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 1 day ago 82% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 85% | 1 day ago 82% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 83% | 1 day ago 84% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 86% | 4 days ago 88% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 16 days ago 78% | 1 day ago 82% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 81% | 1 day ago 89% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 82% | N/A |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
FITE and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FITE has been closely correlated with ZS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 75% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FITE jumps, then ZS could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FITE | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FITE | 100% | +0.74% | ||
| ZS - FITE | 75% Closely correlated | -1.19% | ||
| CRWD - FITE | 72% Closely correlated | -1.56% | ||
| PANW - FITE | 72% Closely correlated | +0.04% | ||
| HXL - FITE | 72% Closely correlated | +0.97% | ||
| CSCO - FITE | 66% Closely correlated | -1.40% | ||
More | ||||
XLK and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, XLK has been closely correlated with NVDA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 84% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if XLK jumps, then NVDA could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To XLK | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| XLK | 100% | -1.22% | ||
| NVDA - XLK | 84% Closely correlated | -1.44% | ||
| TRMB - XLK | 80% Closely correlated | -0.60% | ||
| LRCX - XLK | 80% Closely correlated | -2.61% | ||
| KLAC - XLK | 79% Closely correlated | -0.51% | ||
| MPWR - XLK | 79% Closely correlated | +0.03% | ||
More | ||||