Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FITE vs SMH
FITE vs SMH Comparison
Open Charts FITE vs SMH
Stt Strt® SPDR® S&PKenshoFutSecETF
Price$86.14
Change-$2.16 (-2.45%)
Volume$3.47K
Net Assets94.44M
VanEck Semiconductor ETF
Price$354.12
Change-$16.77 (-4.52%)
Volume$12.71M
Net Assets36.59B
FITE vs SMH Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FITE vs. SMH commentary
Dec 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FITE is a Buy and SMH is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SMH has more net assets: 36.6B vs. FITE (94.4M). SMH has a higher annual dividend yield than FITE: SMH (53.153) vs FITE (32.116). FITE was incepted earlier than SMH: FITE (8 years) vs SMH (14 years). SMH (0.35) has a lower expense ratio than FITE (0.45). FITE has a higher turnover SMH (15.00) vs SMH (15.00).
| FITE | SMH | FITE / SMH | |
| Gain YTD | 32.116 | 53.153 | 60% |
| Net Assets | 94.4M | 36.6B | 0% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.45 | 0.35 | 129% |
| Turnover | 22.00 | 15.00 | 147% |
| Yield | 0.20 | 0.30 | 65% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 14 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| FITE | SMH | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 89% | 3 days ago 80% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 83% | 3 days ago 88% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 83% | 3 days ago 90% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 88% | 3 days ago 88% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 85% | 3 days ago 90% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 83% | 3 days ago 90% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 85% | 4 days ago 90% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 24 days ago 78% | 26 days ago 82% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 84% | 3 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 89% | 3 days ago 83% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
FITE and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FITE has been closely correlated with ZS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 75% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FITE jumps, then ZS could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FITE | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FITE | 100% | +1.85% | ||
| ZS - FITE | 75% Closely correlated | -0.50% | ||
| CRWD - FITE | 72% Closely correlated | -0.36% | ||
| PANW - FITE | 72% Closely correlated | -1.35% | ||
| HXL - FITE | 72% Closely correlated | -4.78% | ||
| RKLB - FITE | 67% Closely correlated | +10.45% | ||
More | ||||
SMH and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SMH has been closely correlated with KLAC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 87% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SMH jumps, then KLAC could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SMH | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SMH | 100% | -0.86% | ||
| KLAC - SMH | 87% Closely correlated | +0.59% | ||
| NVDA - SMH | 86% Closely correlated | -1.55% | ||
| TSM - SMH | 85% Closely correlated | -1.71% | ||
| LRCX - SMH | 82% Closely correlated | +0.27% | ||
| AMAT - SMH | 81% Closely correlated | -1.83% | ||
More | ||||