Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FITE vs SMH
FITE vs SMH Comparison
Open Charts FITE vs SMH
Stt Strt® SPDR® S&PKenshoFutSecETF
Price$82.94
Change-$3.16 (-3.67%)
Volume$12.17K
Net Assets93.72M
VanEck Semiconductor ETF
Price$344.82
Change-$10.71 (-3.01%)
Volume$10.65M
Net Assets37.62B
FITE vs SMH Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FITE vs. SMH commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FITE is a Hold and SMH is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SMH has more net assets: 37.6B vs. FITE (93.7M). SMH has a higher annual dividend yield than FITE: SMH (46.810) vs FITE (28.822). FITE was incepted earlier than SMH: FITE (8 years) vs SMH (14 years). SMH (0.35) has a lower expense ratio than FITE (0.45). FITE has a higher turnover SMH (15.00) vs SMH (15.00).
| FITE | SMH | FITE / SMH | |
| Gain YTD | 28.822 | 46.810 | 62% |
| Net Assets | 93.7M | 37.6B | 0% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.45 | 0.35 | 129% |
| Turnover | 22.00 | 15.00 | 147% |
| Yield | 0.19 | 0.30 | 63% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 14 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| FITE | SMH | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 77% | 2 days ago 80% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 89% | 2 days ago 87% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 80% | 2 days ago 89% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 80% | 2 days ago 86% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 78% | 2 days ago 85% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 76% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 86% | 17 days ago 90% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 78% | 7 days ago 82% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | 2 days ago 90% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
FITE and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FITE has been closely correlated with ZS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 75% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FITE jumps, then ZS could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FITE | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FITE | 100% | -0.85% | ||
| ZS - FITE | 75% Closely correlated | -4.29% | ||
| CRWD - FITE | 72% Closely correlated | -1.95% | ||
| PANW - FITE | 72% Closely correlated | -3.77% | ||
| HXL - FITE | 72% Closely correlated | -0.15% | ||
| CSCO - FITE | 66% Closely correlated | +3.14% | ||
More | ||||
SMH and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SMH has been closely correlated with KLAC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 87% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SMH jumps, then KLAC could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SMH | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SMH | 100% | +1.28% | ||
| KLAC - SMH | 87% Closely correlated | +0.68% | ||
| NVDA - SMH | 86% Closely correlated | +0.33% | ||
| TSM - SMH | 85% Closely correlated | -0.19% | ||
| LRCX - SMH | 81% Closely correlated | +1.41% | ||
| AMAT - SMH | 81% Closely correlated | +0.90% | ||
More | ||||