FITBP
Price
$24.52
Change
+$0.02 (+0.08%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
N/A
HBANM
Price
$22.60
Change
+$0.04 (+0.18%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
N/A
Interact to see
Advertisement

FITBP vs HBANM

Header iconFITBP vs HBANM Comparison
Open Charts FITBP vs HBANMBanner chart's image
Fifth Third Ban
Price$24.52
Change+$0.02 (+0.08%)
Volume$2.31K
CapitalizationN/A
Huntington Bancshares
Price$22.60
Change+$0.04 (+0.18%)
Volume$3.41K
CapitalizationN/A
FITBP vs HBANM Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
FITBP
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
HBANM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FITBP vs. HBANM commentary
Jul 07, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FITBP is a Hold and HBANM is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 07, 2025
Stock price -- (FITBP: $24.52 vs. HBANM: $22.60)
Brand notoriety: FITBP and HBANM are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FITBP: 15% vs. HBANM: 43%
Market capitalization -- FITBP: $0 vs. HBANM: $0
FITBP [@Regional Banks] is valued at $0. HBANM’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $6.03B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FITBP’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileHBANM’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • FITBP’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • HBANM’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, FITBP is a better buy in the long-term than HBANM.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FITBP’s TA Score shows that 7 TA indicator(s) are bullish while HBANM’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FITBP’s TA Score: 7 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • HBANM’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FITBP is a better buy in the short-term than HBANM.

Price Growth

FITBP (@Regional Banks) experienced а +0.49% price change this week, while HBANM (@Regional Banks) price change was +2.12% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +2.86%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.84%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.71%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+2.86% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FITBP YTD gains are higher at: 1.649 vs. HBANM (-7.568). HBANM has less debt than FITBP: HBANM (12.4B) vs FITBP (18.9B). FITBP has higher revenues than HBANM: FITBP (8.54B) vs HBANM (7.36B).
FITBPHBANMFITBP / HBANM
CapitalizationN/AN/A-
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD1.649-7.568-22%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue8.54B7.36B116%
Total CashN/A1.56B-
Total Debt18.9B12.4B152%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FITBP: Fundamental Ratings
FITBP
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
50
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
5
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
44
SMR RATING
1..100
100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
54
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FITBPHBANM
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
9%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
34%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
17%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
43%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
18%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
33%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
14%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
39%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
19%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
36%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
17%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
29%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
17%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
37%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
24%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
13%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
45%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
18%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
36%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FITBP
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
HBANM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
CFR136.191.72
+1.28%
Cullen/Frost Bankers
SLQT2.420.02
+0.83%
SelectQuote
NVEE23.17-0.05
-0.22%
NV5 Global Inc
NSTS12.21-0.12
-0.97%
NSTS Bancorp
MAMO2.79-0.04
-1.41%
Massimo Group

FITBP and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FITBP has been loosely correlated with FITBO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 50% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FITBP jumps, then FITBO could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FITBP
1D Price
Change %
FITBP100%
+0.08%
FITBO - FITBP
50%
Loosely correlated
+1.39%
HBANP - FITBP
47%
Loosely correlated
N/A
FCNCO - FITBP
43%
Loosely correlated
-0.48%
FCNCP - FITBP
43%
Loosely correlated
+0.05%
WAFDP - FITBP
37%
Loosely correlated
+0.44%
More

HBANM and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HBANM has been loosely correlated with FITBP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 38% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if HBANM jumps, then FITBP could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HBANM
1D Price
Change %
HBANM100%
+0.18%
FITBP - HBANM
38%
Loosely correlated
+0.08%
HBANP - HBANM
34%
Loosely correlated
N/A
FCNCO - HBANM
34%
Loosely correlated
-0.48%
WTFCP - HBANM
34%
Loosely correlated
+0.04%
FITBO - HBANM
33%
Poorly correlated
+1.39%
More