Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FISRX vs RLBAX
FISRX vs RLBAX Comparison
Open Charts FISRX vs RLBAX
Franklin Income R
Price$2.49
Change+$0.08 (+3.32%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets78.87B
American Funds American Balanced R1
Price$37.99
Change-$0.59 (-1.53%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets269.72B
FISRX vs RLBAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FISRX vs. RLBAX commentary
Feb 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FISRX is a Hold and RLBAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBAX has more cash in the bank: 270B vs. FISRX (78.9B). FISRX pays higher dividends than RLBAX: FISRX (4.96) vs RLBAX (1.22). FISRX was incepted earlier than RLBAX: FISRX (24 years) vs RLBAX (24 years). RLBAX (1.31) is less costly to investors than FISRX (0.97). FISRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 62.14 vs. RLBAX (44.00). RLBAX has a lower initial minimum investment than FISRX: RLBAX (250) vs FISRX (1000). FISRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.10 vs. RLBAX (10.45). FISRX return over 5 years is better than : 38.66 vs. RLBAX (31.35).
| FISRX | RLBAX | FISRX / RLBAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.96 | 1.31 | 73% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.97 | 1.31 | 74% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.356 | 2.371 | 142% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 250 | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 78.9B | 270B | 29% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 4.96 | 1.22 | 407% |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.10 | 10.45 | 125% |
| Returns for 3 years | 26.56 | 33.63 | 79% |
| Returns for 5 years | 38.66 | 31.35 | 123% |
| Returns for 10 years | 96.64 | 79.34 | 122% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers