Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FISRX vs RLBAX
FISRX vs RLBAX Comparison
Open Charts FISRX vs RLBAX
Franklin Income R
Price$2.41
Change+$0.01 (+0.42%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets76.16B
American Funds American Balanced R1
Price$38.62
Change+$0.04 (+0.10%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets265.37B
FISRX vs RLBAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FISRX vs. RLBAX commentary
Oct 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FISRX is a Hold and RLBAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBAX has more cash in the bank: 265B vs. FISRX (76.2B). FISRX pays higher dividends than RLBAX: FISRX (5.13) vs RLBAX (1.10). FISRX was incepted earlier than RLBAX: FISRX (24 years) vs RLBAX (23 years). RLBAX (1.31) is less costly to investors than FISRX (0.97). FISRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 49.72 vs. RLBAX (44.00). RLBAX has a lower initial minimum investment than FISRX: RLBAX (250) vs FISRX (1000). RLBAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.84 vs. FISRX (6.76). FISRX return over 5 years is better than : 47.34 vs. RLBAX (37.69).
| FISRX | RLBAX | FISRX / RLBAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.96 | 1.31 | 73% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.97 | 1.31 | 74% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.508 | 13.947 | 68% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 250 | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 76.2B | 265B | 29% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 5.13 | 1.10 | 466% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.76 | 7.84 | 86% |
| Returns for 3 years | 32.85 | 47.39 | 69% |
| Returns for 5 years | 47.34 | 37.69 | 126% |
| Returns for 10 years | 69.94 | 67.66 | 103% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement