Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FIQWX vs LMCMX
FIQWX vs LMCMX Comparison
Open Charts FIQWX vs LMCMX
Fidelity Advisor Strategic Div & Inc Z
Price$17.98
Change+$0.09 (+0.50%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.3B
Miller Income IS
Price$9.24
Change+$0.08 (+0.87%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets179.88M
FIQWX vs LMCMX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FIQWX vs. LMCMX commentary
Sep 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FIQWX is a Buy and LMCMX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FIQWX has more cash in the bank: 5.3B vs. LMCMX (180M). LMCMX pays higher dividends than FIQWX: LMCMX (5.13) vs FIQWX (2.47). FIQWX was incepted earlier than LMCMX: FIQWX (7 years) vs LMCMX (12 years). LMCMX (1.06) is less costly to investors than FIQWX (0.56). LMCMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 38.00 vs. FIQWX (36.00). FIQWX has a lower initial minimum investment than LMCMX: FIQWX (0) vs LMCMX (1000000). LMCMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 21.90 vs. FIQWX (6.55). LMCMX return over 5 years is better than : 86.26 vs. FIQWX (34.60).
| FIQWX | LMCMX | FIQWX / LMCMX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.56 | 0.91 | 62% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.56 | 1.06 | 53% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.783 | 9.895 | 89% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 5.3B | 180M | 2,945% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.47 | 5.13 | 48% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.55 | 21.90 | 30% |
| Returns for 3 years | 25.34 | 63.02 | 40% |
| Returns for 5 years | 34.60 | 86.26 | 40% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 100.78 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers