Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FIQWX vs LCMNX
FIQWX vs LCMNX Comparison
Open Charts FIQWX vs LCMNX
Fidelity Advisor Strategic Div & Inc Z
Price$17.98
Change+$0.09 (+0.50%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.3B
Miller Income C
Price$9.34
Change+$0.09 (+0.97%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets179.88M
FIQWX vs LCMNX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FIQWX vs. LCMNX commentary
Sep 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FIQWX is a Buy and LCMNX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FIQWX has more cash in the bank: 5.3B vs. LCMNX (180M). LCMNX pays higher dividends than FIQWX: LCMNX (3.33) vs FIQWX (2.47). FIQWX was incepted earlier than LCMNX: FIQWX (7 years) vs LCMNX (12 years). LCMNX (2.13) is less costly to investors than FIQWX (0.56). LCMNX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 38.00 vs. FIQWX (36.00). FIQWX has a lower initial minimum investment than LCMNX: FIQWX (0) vs LCMNX (1000). LCMNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 20.67 vs. FIQWX (6.55). LCMNX return over 5 years is better than : 77.81 vs. FIQWX (34.60).
| FIQWX | LCMNX | FIQWX / LCMNX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.56 | 1.98 | 28% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.56 | 2.13 | 26% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.783 | 9.212 | 95% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 5.3B | 180M | 2,945% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.47 | 3.33 | 74% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.55 | 20.67 | 32% |
| Returns for 3 years | 25.34 | 58.47 | 43% |
| Returns for 5 years | 34.60 | 77.81 | 44% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 83.59 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement