Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FIQWX vs LCMNX
FIQWX vs LCMNX Comparison
Open Charts FIQWX vs LCMNX
Fidelity Advisor Strategic Div & Inc Z
Price$17.75
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.23B
Miller Income C
Price$9.18
Change-$0.09 (-0.97%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets176.99M
FIQWX vs LCMNX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FIQWX vs. LCMNX commentary
Aug 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FIQWX is a Buy and LCMNX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FIQWX has more cash in the bank: 5.23B vs. LCMNX (177M). LCMNX pays higher dividends than FIQWX: LCMNX (3.51) vs FIQWX (2.53). FIQWX was incepted earlier than LCMNX: FIQWX (7 years) vs LCMNX (11 years). LCMNX (2.13) is less costly to investors than FIQWX (0.56). LCMNX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 38.00 vs. FIQWX (36.00). FIQWX has a lower initial minimum investment than LCMNX: FIQWX (0) vs LCMNX (1000). LCMNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 19.50 vs. FIQWX (6.43). LCMNX return over 5 years is better than : 71.83 vs. FIQWX (32.57).
| FIQWX | LCMNX | FIQWX / LCMNX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.56 | 1.98 | 28% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.56 | 2.13 | 26% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.212 | 7.341 | 98% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 5.23B | 177M | 2,953% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.53 | 3.51 | 72% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.43 | 19.50 | 33% |
| Returns for 3 years | 15.83 | 42.37 | 37% |
| Returns for 5 years | 32.57 | 71.83 | 45% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 73.74 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers