Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FIQPX vs TRZNX
FIQPX vs TRZNX Comparison
Open Charts FIQPX vs TRZNX
Fidelity Advisor Emerging Asia Z
Price$57.03
Change-$0.50 (-0.87%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets489.18M
T. Rowe Price New Asia Z
Price$18.26
Change-$0.23 (-1.24%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.91B
FIQPX vs TRZNX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TRZNX has more cash in the bank: 1.91B vs. FIQPX (489M). TRZNX pays higher dividends than FIQPX: TRZNX (2.08) vs FIQPX (0.00). FIQPX was incepted earlier than TRZNX: FIQPX (7 years) vs TRZNX (4 years). TRZNX (0.83) and FIQPX (0.81) have similar cost to investors . FIQPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 59.00 vs. TRZNX (54.80). FIQPX (0) and TRZNX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FIQPX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 25.28 vs. TRZNX (10.24).
| FIQPX | TRZNX | FIQPX / TRZNX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.81 | 0.00 | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.81 | 0.83 | 98% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 4 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 16.955 | 11.790 | 144% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 489M | 1.91B | 26% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 2.08 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 25.28 | 10.24 | 247% |
| Returns for 3 years | 49.68 | 15.98 | 311% |
| Returns for 5 years | 15.64 | N/A | - |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement