Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FIQPX vs PNSIX
FIQPX vs PNSIX Comparison
Open Charts FIQPX vs PNSIX
Fidelity Advisor Emerging Asia Z
Price$65.02
Change-$0.23 (-0.35%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets554.38M
T. Rowe Price New Asia I
Price$20.61
Change-$0.03 (-0.15%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.15B
FIQPX vs PNSIX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FIQPX vs. PNSIX commentary
Dec 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FIQPX is a Hold and PNSIX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PNSIX has more cash in the bank: 2.15B vs. FIQPX (554M). PNSIX pays higher dividends than FIQPX: PNSIX (1.03) vs FIQPX (0.00). FIQPX was incepted earlier than PNSIX: FIQPX (7 years) vs PNSIX (10 years). PNSIX (0.86) is less costly to investors than FIQPX (0.81). FIQPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 59.00 vs. PNSIX (54.80). FIQPX has a lower initial minimum investment than PNSIX: FIQPX (0) vs PNSIX (500000). FIQPX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 28.32 vs. PNSIX (21.63). FIQPX return over 5 years is better than : -1.44 vs. PNSIX (-10.83).
| FIQPX | PNSIX | FIQPX / PNSIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.81 | 0.83 | 98% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.81 | 0.86 | 94% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 32.446 | 23.515 | 138% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 500000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 554M | 2.15B | 26% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 1.03 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 28.32 | 21.63 | 131% |
| Returns for 3 years | 75.23 | 28.15 | 267% |
| Returns for 5 years | -1.44 | -10.83 | 13% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |