Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FIQPX vs MIPTX
FIQPX vs MIPTX Comparison
Open Charts FIQPX vs MIPTX
Fidelity Advisor Emerging Asia Z
Price$63.17
Change+$0.02 (+0.03%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets520.52M
Matthews Pacific Tiger Instl
Price$21.50
Change+$0.27 (+1.27%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets702.82M
FIQPX vs MIPTX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FIQPX vs. MIPTX commentary
Sep 10, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FIQPX is a Buy and MIPTX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MIPTX has more cash in the bank: 703M vs. FIQPX (521M). MIPTX pays higher dividends than FIQPX: MIPTX (2.83) vs FIQPX (0.00). FIQPX was incepted earlier than MIPTX: FIQPX (7 years) vs MIPTX (15 years). MIPTX (1.09) is less costly to investors than FIQPX (0.81). MIPTX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 386.73 vs. FIQPX (59.00). FIQPX has a lower initial minimum investment than MIPTX: FIQPX (0) vs MIPTX (100000). FIQPX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 42.68 vs. MIPTX (17.87). FIQPX return over 5 years is better than : 12.79 vs. MIPTX (-25.85).
| FIQPX | MIPTX | FIQPX / MIPTX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.81 | 1.09 | 74% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.81 | 1.09 | 74% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 26.611 | 20.147 | 132% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 100000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 521M | 703M | 74% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 2.83 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 42.68 | 17.87 | 239% |
| Returns for 3 years | 72.14 | 1.22 | 5,934% |
| Returns for 5 years | 12.79 | -25.85 | -49% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | -1.16 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement