Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FIQPX vs IASMX
FIQPX vs IASMX Comparison
Open Charts FIQPX vs IASMX
Fidelity Advisor Emerging Asia Z
Price$66.40
Change-$0.25 (-0.38%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets563.68M
Guinness Atkinson Asia Focus
Price$19.79
Change-$0.09 (-0.45%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets11.55M
FIQPX vs IASMX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FIQPX vs. IASMX commentary
Oct 21, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FIQPX is a Hold and IASMX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FIQPX has more cash in the bank: 564M vs. IASMX (11.5M). IASMX pays higher dividends than FIQPX: IASMX (0.35) vs FIQPX (0.00). FIQPX was incepted earlier than IASMX: FIQPX (7 years) vs IASMX (29 years). IASMX (2.50) is less costly to investors than FIQPX (0.81). FIQPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 59.00 vs. IASMX (6.18). FIQPX has a lower initial minimum investment than IASMX: FIQPX (0) vs IASMX (5000). FIQPX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 31.64 vs. IASMX (29.86). FIQPX return over 5 years is better than : 11.25 vs. IASMX (-7.58).
| FIQPX | IASMX | FIQPX / IASMX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.81 | 1.99 | 41% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.81 | 2.50 | 32% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 29 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 34.987 | 29.770 | 118% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 5000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 564M | 11.5M | 4,904% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.35 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 31.64 | 29.86 | 106% |
| Returns for 3 years | 108.48 | 55.04 | 197% |
| Returns for 5 years | 11.25 | -7.58 | -148% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 36.00 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement