Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FIQFX vs RBCRX
FIQFX vs RBCRX Comparison
Open Charts FIQFX vs RBCRX
Fidelity Advisor China Region Z
Price$44.58
Change+$0.10 (+0.22%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.24B
RBC China Equity R6
Price$9.94
Change+$0.01 (+0.10%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.18M
FIQFX vs RBCRX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FIQFX vs. RBCRX commentary
Jul 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FIQFX is a Hold and RBCRX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FIQFX has more cash in the bank: 1.24B vs. RBCRX (5.18M). RBCRX pays higher dividends than FIQFX: RBCRX (1.76) vs FIQFX (1.39). FIQFX was incepted earlier than RBCRX: FIQFX (7 years) vs RBCRX (3 years). RBCRX (6.88) is less costly to investors than FIQFX (0.77). RBCRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 138.00 vs. FIQFX (30.00). FIQFX has a lower initial minimum investment than RBCRX: FIQFX (0) vs RBCRX (250000). FIQFX (19.70) and RBCRX (19.04) have marching annual gain over last year.
| FIQFX | RBCRX | FIQFX / RBCRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.77 | 1.00 | 77% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.77 | 6.88 | 11% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 3 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.672 | 16.941 | 93% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.24B | 5.18M | 23,856% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.39 | 1.76 | 79% |
| Returns for 1 year | 19.70 | 19.04 | 103% |
| Returns for 3 years | 31.84 | -1.02 | -3,118% |
| Returns for 5 years | 4.67 | N/A | - |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 2.33 | - |