Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FIQFX vs RBCRX
FIQFX vs RBCRX Comparison
Open Charts FIQFX vs RBCRX
Fidelity Advisor China Region Z
Price$54.88
Change-$0.56 (-1.01%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.81B
RBC China Equity R6
Price$13.15
Change+$0.04 (+0.31%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets6.83M
FIQFX vs RBCRX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FIQFX vs. RBCRX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FIQFX is a Hold and RBCRX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FIQFX has more cash in the bank: 1.81B vs. RBCRX (6.83M). RBCRX pays higher dividends than FIQFX: RBCRX (1.35) vs FIQFX (1.09). FIQFX was incepted earlier than RBCRX: FIQFX (7 years) vs RBCRX (4 years). RBCRX (6.74) is less costly to investors than FIQFX (0.77). RBCRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 132.00 vs. FIQFX (30.00). FIQFX has a lower initial minimum investment than RBCRX: FIQFX (0) vs RBCRX (250000). RBCRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 47.81 vs. FIQFX (40.95).
| FIQFX | RBCRX | FIQFX / RBCRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.77 | 1.00 | 77% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.77 | 6.74 | 11% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 4 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 43.773 | 54.235 | 81% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.81B | 6.83M | 26,533% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.09 | 1.35 | 81% |
| Returns for 1 year | 40.95 | 47.81 | 86% |
| Returns for 3 years | 94.24 | 63.61 | 148% |
| Returns for 5 years | 8.01 | N/A | - |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 37.72 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement