Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FIQFX vs RBCRX
FIQFX vs RBCRX Comparison
Open Charts FIQFX vs RBCRX
Fidelity Advisor China Region Z
Price$53.80
Change-$0.12 (-0.22%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.74B
RBC China Equity R6
Price$12.59
Change-$0.05 (-0.40%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets6.56M
FIQFX vs RBCRX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FIQFX vs. RBCRX commentary
Dec 05, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FIQFX is a Hold and RBCRX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FIQFX has more cash in the bank: 1.74B vs. RBCRX (6.56M). RBCRX pays higher dividends than FIQFX: RBCRX (1.40) vs FIQFX (1.14). FIQFX was incepted earlier than RBCRX: FIQFX (7 years) vs RBCRX (4 years). RBCRX (6.74) is less costly to investors than FIQFX (0.77). RBCRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 132.00 vs. FIQFX (30.00). FIQFX has a lower initial minimum investment than RBCRX: FIQFX (0) vs RBCRX (250000). RBCRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 43.54 vs. FIQFX (38.10).
| FIQFX | RBCRX | FIQFX / RBCRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.77 | 1.00 | 77% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.77 | 6.74 | 11% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 4 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 39.595 | 48.118 | 82% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.74B | 6.56M | 26,513% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.14 | 1.40 | 81% |
| Returns for 1 year | 38.10 | 43.54 | 88% |
| Returns for 3 years | 70.69 | 43.57 | 162% |
| Returns for 5 years | 5.38 | N/A | - |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 31.58 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement