Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FIQFX vs MICDX
FIQFX vs MICDX Comparison
Open Charts FIQFX vs MICDX
Fidelity Advisor China Region Z
Price$54.88
Change-$0.56 (-1.01%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.81B
Matthews China Dividend Instl
Price$15.58
Change-$0.05 (-0.32%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets99.35M
FIQFX vs MICDX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FIQFX vs. MICDX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FIQFX is a Hold and MICDX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FIQFX has more cash in the bank: 1.81B vs. MICDX (99.3M). MICDX pays higher dividends than FIQFX: MICDX (2.93) vs FIQFX (1.09). FIQFX was incepted earlier than MICDX: FIQFX (7 years) vs MICDX (15 years). MICDX (1.19) is less costly to investors than FIQFX (0.77). MICDX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 75.80 vs. FIQFX (30.00). FIQFX has a lower initial minimum investment than MICDX: FIQFX (0) vs MICDX (100000). FIQFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 40.95 vs. MICDX (35.98). FIQFX return over 5 years is better than : 8.01 vs. MICDX (-1.71).
| FIQFX | MICDX | FIQFX / MICDX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.77 | 1.19 | 65% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.77 | 1.19 | 65% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 43.773 | 34.950 | 125% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 100000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.81B | 99.3M | 1,826% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.09 | 2.93 | 37% |
| Returns for 1 year | 40.95 | 35.98 | 114% |
| Returns for 3 years | 94.24 | 36.84 | 256% |
| Returns for 5 years | 8.01 | -1.71 | -470% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 45.41 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement