Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FIQFX vs MICDX
FIQFX vs MICDX Comparison
Open Charts FIQFX vs MICDX
Fidelity Advisor China Region Z
Price$46.80
Change-$0.04 (-0.09%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.24B
Matthews China Dividend Instl
Price$14.12
Change+$0.03 (+0.21%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets90.37M
FIQFX vs MICDX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FIQFX vs. MICDX commentary
Jul 30, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FIQFX is a Hold and MICDX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FIQFX has more cash in the bank: 1.24B vs. MICDX (90.4M). MICDX pays higher dividends than FIQFX: MICDX (3.37) vs FIQFX (1.39). FIQFX was incepted earlier than MICDX: FIQFX (7 years) vs MICDX (15 years). MICDX (1.19) is less costly to investors than FIQFX (0.77). MICDX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 75.80 vs. FIQFX (30.00). FIQFX has a lower initial minimum investment than MICDX: FIQFX (0) vs MICDX (100000). MICDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 39.62 vs. FIQFX (34.17). FIQFX return over 5 years is better than : 3.95 vs. MICDX (-4.96).
| FIQFX | MICDX | FIQFX / MICDX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.77 | 1.19 | 65% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.77 | 1.19 | 65% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 21.536 | 21.912 | 98% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 100000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.24B | 90.4M | 1,367% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.39 | 3.37 | 41% |
| Returns for 1 year | 34.17 | 39.62 | 86% |
| Returns for 3 years | 46.04 | 12.08 | 381% |
| Returns for 5 years | 3.95 | -4.96 | -80% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 26.30 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement