Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FIQFX vs MCSMX
FIQFX vs MCSMX Comparison
Open Charts FIQFX vs MCSMX
Fidelity Advisor China Region Z
Price$54.88
Change-$0.56 (-1.01%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.81B
Matthews China Small Companies
Price$11.79
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets68.23M
FIQFX vs MCSMX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FIQFX vs. MCSMX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FIQFX is a Hold and MCSMX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FIQFX has more cash in the bank: 1.81B vs. MCSMX (68.2M). FIQFX (1.09) and MCSMX (1.04) have matching dividends . FIQFX was incepted earlier than MCSMX: FIQFX (7 years) vs MCSMX (14 years). MCSMX (1.61) is less costly to investors than FIQFX (0.77). MCSMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 54.39 vs. FIQFX (30.00). FIQFX has a lower initial minimum investment than MCSMX: FIQFX (0) vs MCSMX (2500). FIQFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 42.42 vs. MCSMX (28.90). FIQFX return over 5 years is better than : 8.07 vs. MCSMX (-40.79).
| FIQFX | MCSMX | FIQFX / MCSMX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.77 | 1.40 | 55% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.77 | 1.61 | 48% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 43.851 | 29.846 | 147% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.81B | 68.2M | 2,658% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.09 | 1.04 | 105% |
| Returns for 1 year | 42.42 | 28.90 | 147% |
| Returns for 3 years | 93.76 | 15.37 | 610% |
| Returns for 5 years | 8.07 | -40.79 | -20% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 39.62 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement