Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FIQFX vs MCSMX
FIQFX vs MCSMX Comparison
Open Charts FIQFX vs MCSMX
Fidelity Advisor China Region Z
Price$49.97
Change+$0.67 (+1.36%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.38B
Matthews China Small Companies
Price$11.66
Change+$0.01 (+0.09%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets71.64M
FIQFX vs MCSMX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FIQFX vs. MCSMX commentary
Sep 10, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FIQFX is a Buy and MCSMX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FIQFX has more cash in the bank: 1.39B vs. MCSMX (71.6M). FIQFX pays higher dividends than MCSMX: FIQFX (1.26) vs MCSMX (1.04). FIQFX was incepted earlier than MCSMX: FIQFX (7 years) vs MCSMX (14 years). MCSMX (1.61) is less costly to investors than FIQFX (0.77). MCSMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 54.39 vs. FIQFX (30.00). FIQFX has a lower initial minimum investment than MCSMX: FIQFX (0) vs MCSMX (2500). MCSMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 49.83 vs. FIQFX (44.52). FIQFX return over 5 years is better than : 7.18 vs. MCSMX (-37.40).
| FIQFX | MCSMX | FIQFX / MCSMX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.77 | 1.40 | 55% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.77 | 1.61 | 48% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 27.919 | 28.304 | 99% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.39B | 71.6M | 1,934% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.26 | 1.04 | 121% |
| Returns for 1 year | 44.52 | 49.83 | 89% |
| Returns for 3 years | 59.51 | 5.86 | 1,016% |
| Returns for 5 years | 7.18 | -37.40 | -19% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 48.78 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement