Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FIQFX vs MCSMX
FIQFX vs MCSMX Comparison
Open Charts FIQFX vs MCSMX
Fidelity Advisor China Region Z
Price$42.90
Change-$0.66 (-1.52%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.15B
Matthews China Small Companies
Price$9.95
Change-$0.18 (-1.78%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets65.66M
FIQFX vs MCSMX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FIQFX vs. MCSMX commentary
Jun 16, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FIQFX is a Hold and MCSMX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FIQFX has more cash in the bank: 1.15B vs. MCSMX (65.7M). FIQFX pays higher dividends than MCSMX: FIQFX (1.50) vs MCSMX (1.28). FIQFX was incepted earlier than MCSMX: FIQFX (7 years) vs MCSMX (14 years). MCSMX (1.61) is less costly to investors than FIQFX (0.77). MCSMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 54.39 vs. FIQFX (30.00). FIQFX has a lower initial minimum investment than MCSMX: FIQFX (0) vs MCSMX (2500). FIQFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 17.71 vs. MCSMX (10.81). FIQFX return over 5 years is better than : 8.54 vs. MCSMX (-41.28).
| FIQFX | MCSMX | FIQFX / MCSMX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.77 | 1.40 | 55% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.77 | 1.61 | 48% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.313 | 9.581 | 118% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.15B | 65.7M | 1,749% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.50 | 1.28 | 117% |
| Returns for 1 year | 17.71 | 10.81 | 164% |
| Returns for 3 years | 29.36 | -12.89 | -228% |
| Returns for 5 years | 8.54 | -41.28 | -21% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 0.07 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers