Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FIQFX vs MCSMX
FIQFX vs MCSMX Comparison
Open Charts FIQFX vs MCSMX
Fidelity Advisor China Region Z
Price$46.84
Change-$0.01 (-0.02%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.24B
Matthews China Small Companies
Price$10.82
Change-$0.02 (-0.18%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets62.28M
FIQFX vs MCSMX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FIQFX vs. MCSMX commentary
Jul 29, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FIQFX is a Buy and MCSMX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FIQFX has more cash in the bank: 1.24B vs. MCSMX (62.3M). FIQFX pays higher dividends than MCSMX: FIQFX (1.39) vs MCSMX (1.22). FIQFX was incepted earlier than MCSMX: FIQFX (7 years) vs MCSMX (14 years). MCSMX (1.61) is less costly to investors than FIQFX (0.77). MCSMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 54.39 vs. FIQFX (30.00). FIQFX has a lower initial minimum investment than MCSMX: FIQFX (0) vs MCSMX (2500). MCSMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 35.05 vs. FIQFX (33.26). FIQFX return over 5 years is better than : 3.47 vs. MCSMX (-44.27).
| FIQFX | MCSMX | FIQFX / MCSMX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.77 | 1.40 | 55% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.77 | 1.61 | 48% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 21.562 | 19.163 | 113% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.24B | 62.3M | 1,984% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.39 | 1.22 | 113% |
| Returns for 1 year | 33.26 | 35.05 | 95% |
| Returns for 3 years | 46.07 | -8.90 | -518% |
| Returns for 5 years | 3.47 | -44.27 | -8% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 21.14 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement