Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FIQFX vs MCDFX
FIQFX vs MCDFX Comparison
Open Charts FIQFX vs MCDFX
Fidelity Advisor China Region Z
Price$47.70
Change-$0.31 (-0.65%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.3B
Matthews China Dividend Investor
Price$14.25
Change-$0.08 (-0.56%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets95.69M
FIQFX vs MCDFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FIQFX vs. MCDFX commentary
Aug 21, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FIQFX is a Buy and MCDFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FIQFX has more cash in the bank: 1.31B vs. MCDFX (95.7M). MCDFX pays higher dividends than FIQFX: MCDFX (3.08) vs FIQFX (1.32). FIQFX was incepted earlier than MCDFX: FIQFX (7 years) vs MCDFX (16 years). MCDFX (1.32) is less costly to investors than FIQFX (0.77). MCDFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 75.80 vs. FIQFX (30.00). FIQFX has a lower initial minimum investment than MCDFX: FIQFX (0) vs MCDFX (2500). MCDFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 37.34 vs. FIQFX (30.39). FIQFX return over 5 years is better than : 5.79 vs. MCDFX (-6.19).
| FIQFX | MCDFX | FIQFX / MCDFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.77 | 1.32 | 58% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.77 | 1.32 | 58% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 24.572 | 23.179 | 106% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.31B | 95.7M | 1,364% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.32 | 3.08 | 43% |
| Returns for 1 year | 30.39 | 37.34 | 81% |
| Returns for 3 years | 53.02 | 16.73 | 317% |
| Returns for 5 years | 5.79 | -6.19 | -94% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 40.67 | - |