Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FIQFX vs MCDFX
FIQFX vs MCDFX Comparison
Open Charts FIQFX vs MCDFX
Fidelity Advisor China Region Z
Price$50.62
Change+$0.65 (+1.30%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.38B
Matthews China Dividend Investor
Price$14.91
Change+$0.07 (+0.47%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets99.42M
FIQFX vs MCDFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FIQFX vs. MCDFX commentary
Sep 10, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FIQFX is a Buy and MCDFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FIQFX has more cash in the bank: 1.39B vs. MCDFX (99.4M). MCDFX pays higher dividends than FIQFX: MCDFX (2.90) vs FIQFX (1.26). FIQFX was incepted earlier than MCDFX: FIQFX (7 years) vs MCDFX (16 years). MCDFX (1.32) is less costly to investors than FIQFX (0.77). MCDFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 75.80 vs. FIQFX (30.00). FIQFX has a lower initial minimum investment than MCDFX: FIQFX (0) vs MCDFX (2500). MCDFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 48.42 vs. FIQFX (44.52). FIQFX return over 5 years is better than : 7.18 vs. MCDFX (-0.40).
| FIQFX | MCDFX | FIQFX / MCDFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.77 | 1.32 | 58% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.77 | 1.32 | 58% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 27.919 | 28.279 | 99% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.39B | 99.4M | 1,393% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.26 | 2.90 | 43% |
| Returns for 1 year | 44.52 | 48.42 | 92% |
| Returns for 3 years | 59.51 | 22.28 | 267% |
| Returns for 5 years | 7.18 | -0.40 | -1,797% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 45.29 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement