Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FIQFX vs MCDFX
FIQFX vs MCDFX Comparison
Open Charts FIQFX vs MCDFX
Fidelity Advisor China Region Z
Price$46.85
Change-$0.02 (-0.04%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.24B
Matthews China Dividend Investor
Price$14.07
Change-$0.06 (-0.42%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets90.37M
FIQFX vs MCDFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FIQFX vs. MCDFX commentary
Jul 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FIQFX is a Buy and MCDFX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FIQFX has more cash in the bank: 1.24B vs. MCDFX (90.4M). MCDFX pays higher dividends than FIQFX: MCDFX (3.26) vs FIQFX (1.39). FIQFX was incepted earlier than MCDFX: FIQFX (7 years) vs MCDFX (16 years). MCDFX (1.32) is less costly to investors than FIQFX (0.77). MCDFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 75.80 vs. FIQFX (30.00). FIQFX has a lower initial minimum investment than MCDFX: FIQFX (0) vs MCDFX (2500). MCDFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 40.17 vs. FIQFX (34.05). FIQFX return over 5 years is better than : 6.33 vs. MCDFX (-4.14).
| FIQFX | MCDFX | FIQFX / MCDFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.77 | 1.32 | 58% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.77 | 1.32 | 58% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 21.562 | 21.623 | 100% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.24B | 90.4M | 1,367% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.39 | 3.26 | 43% |
| Returns for 1 year | 34.05 | 40.17 | 85% |
| Returns for 3 years | 43.93 | 10.53 | 417% |
| Returns for 5 years | 6.33 | -4.14 | -153% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 24.60 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement