Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FIQFX vs MCDFX
FIQFX vs MCDFX Comparison
Open Charts FIQFX vs MCDFX
Fidelity Advisor China Region Z
Price$44.58
Change+$0.10 (+0.22%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.24B
Matthews China Dividend Investor
Price$13.13
Change-$0.03 (-0.23%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets88.33M
FIQFX vs MCDFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FIQFX vs. MCDFX commentary
Jul 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FIQFX is a Hold and MCDFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FIQFX has more cash in the bank: 1.24B vs. MCDFX (88.3M). MCDFX pays higher dividends than FIQFX: MCDFX (3.26) vs FIQFX (1.39). FIQFX was incepted earlier than MCDFX: FIQFX (7 years) vs MCDFX (16 years). MCDFX (1.32) is less costly to investors than FIQFX (0.77). MCDFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 75.80 vs. FIQFX (30.00). FIQFX has a lower initial minimum investment than MCDFX: FIQFX (0) vs MCDFX (2500). MCDFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 23.77 vs. FIQFX (19.70). FIQFX return over 5 years is better than : 4.67 vs. MCDFX (-8.58).
| FIQFX | MCDFX | FIQFX / MCDFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.77 | 1.32 | 58% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.77 | 1.32 | 58% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.672 | 13.498 | 116% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.24B | 88.3M | 1,400% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.39 | 3.26 | 43% |
| Returns for 1 year | 19.70 | 23.77 | 83% |
| Returns for 3 years | 31.84 | -1.98 | -1,608% |
| Returns for 5 years | 4.67 | -8.58 | -54% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 14.34 | - |