Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FIQFX vs GSAGX
FIQFX vs GSAGX Comparison
Open Charts FIQFX vs GSAGX
Fidelity Advisor China Region Z
Price$55.44
Change+$0.03 (+0.05%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.81B
Goldman Sachs China Equity A
Price$26.28
Change-$0.07 (-0.27%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets41.63M
FIQFX vs GSAGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FIQFX vs. GSAGX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FIQFX is a Hold and GSAGX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FIQFX has more cash in the bank: 1.81B vs. GSAGX (41.6M). FIQFX (1.09) and GSAGX (1.05) have matching dividends . FIQFX was incepted earlier than GSAGX: FIQFX (7 years) vs GSAGX (31 years). GSAGX (2.30) is less costly to investors than FIQFX (0.77). GSAGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 70.00 vs. FIQFX (30.00). FIQFX has a lower initial minimum investment than GSAGX: FIQFX (0) vs GSAGX (1000). FIQFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 40.95 vs. GSAGX (31.99). FIQFX return over 5 years is better than : 8.01 vs. GSAGX (-30.70).
| FIQFX | GSAGX | FIQFX / GSAGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.77 | 1.46 | 53% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.77 | 2.30 | 33% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 31 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 43.773 | 34.150 | 128% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.81B | 41.6M | 4,358% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.09 | 1.05 | 104% |
| Returns for 1 year | 40.95 | 31.99 | 128% |
| Returns for 3 years | 94.24 | 35.54 | 265% |
| Returns for 5 years | 8.01 | -30.70 | -26% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 35.28 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement