Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FIQFX vs GSAGX
FIQFX vs GSAGX Comparison
Open Charts FIQFX vs GSAGX
Fidelity Advisor China Region Z
Price$59.78
Change+$3.88 (+6.94%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.07B
Goldman Sachs China Equity A
Price$26.67
Change-$0.50 (-1.84%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets42.18M
FIQFX vs GSAGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FIQFX vs. GSAGX commentary
Feb 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FIQFX is a Hold and GSAGX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FIQFX has more cash in the bank: 2.07B vs. GSAGX (42.2M). FIQFX pays higher dividends than GSAGX: FIQFX (1.87) vs GSAGX (1.27). FIQFX was incepted earlier than GSAGX: FIQFX (7 years) vs GSAGX (32 years). GSAGX (2.30) is less costly to investors than FIQFX (0.77). GSAGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 63.00 vs. FIQFX (34.00). FIQFX has a lower initial minimum investment than GSAGX: FIQFX (250) vs GSAGX (1000). FIQFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 57.17 vs. GSAGX (36.12). FIQFX return over 5 years is better than : 2.72 vs. GSAGX (-37.78).
| FIQFX | GSAGX | FIQFX / GSAGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.77 | 1.46 | 53% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.77 | 2.30 | 33% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 32 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.930 | 4.261 | 256% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.07B | 42.2M | 4,905% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.87 | 1.27 | 147% |
| Returns for 1 year | 57.17 | 36.12 | 158% |
| Returns for 3 years | 72.89 | 16.18 | 451% |
| Returns for 5 years | 2.72 | -37.78 | -7% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 52.82 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement