Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FIQFX vs GSAFX
FIQFX vs GSAFX Comparison
Open Charts FIQFX vs GSAFX
Fidelity Advisor China Region Z
Price$53.80
Change-$0.12 (-0.22%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.74B
Goldman Sachs China Equity R6
Price$27.92
Change-$0.15 (-0.53%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets40.8M
FIQFX vs GSAFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FIQFX vs. GSAFX commentary
Dec 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FIQFX is a Hold and GSAFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FIQFX has more cash in the bank: 1.74B vs. GSAFX (40.8M). GSAFX pays higher dividends than FIQFX: GSAFX (1.21) vs FIQFX (1.14). FIQFX was incepted earlier than GSAFX: FIQFX (7 years) vs GSAFX (8 years). GSAFX (1.93) is less costly to investors than FIQFX (0.77). GSAFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 70.00 vs. FIQFX (30.00). FIQFX has a lower initial minimum investment than GSAFX: FIQFX (0) vs GSAFX (5000000). FIQFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 39.23 vs. GSAFX (34.80). FIQFX return over 5 years is better than : 2.34 vs. GSAFX (-29.83).
| FIQFX | GSAFX | FIQFX / GSAFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.77 | 1.09 | 71% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.77 | 1.93 | 40% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 39.881 | 33.853 | 118% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 5000000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.74B | 40.8M | 4,262% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.14 | 1.21 | 94% |
| Returns for 1 year | 39.23 | 34.80 | 113% |
| Returns for 3 years | 71.04 | 26.18 | 271% |
| Returns for 5 years | 2.34 | -29.83 | -8% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement