Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FIQFX vs GSAFX
FIQFX vs GSAFX Comparison
Open Charts FIQFX vs GSAFX
Fidelity Advisor China Region Z
Price$44.58
Change+$0.10 (+0.22%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.24B
Goldman Sachs China Equity R6
Price$24.51
Change-$0.03 (-0.12%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets34.93M
FIQFX vs GSAFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FIQFX vs. GSAFX commentary
Jul 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FIQFX is a Hold and GSAFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FIQFX has more cash in the bank: 1.24B vs. GSAFX (34.9M). FIQFX (1.39) and GSAFX (1.38) have matching dividends . FIQFX was incepted earlier than GSAFX: FIQFX (7 years) vs GSAFX (7 years). GSAFX (1.93) is less costly to investors than FIQFX (0.77). GSAFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 70.00 vs. FIQFX (30.00). FIQFX has a lower initial minimum investment than GSAFX: FIQFX (0) vs GSAFX (5000000). GSAFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 27.78 vs. FIQFX (19.70). FIQFX return over 5 years is better than : 4.67 vs. GSAFX (-23.30).
| FIQFX | GSAFX | FIQFX / GSAFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.77 | 1.09 | 71% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.77 | 1.93 | 40% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 7 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.672 | 15.887 | 99% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 5000000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.24B | 34.9M | 3,542% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.39 | 1.38 | 101% |
| Returns for 1 year | 19.70 | 27.78 | 71% |
| Returns for 3 years | 31.84 | -11.77 | -271% |
| Returns for 5 years | 4.67 | -23.30 | -20% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |