Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FIQFX vs GSAFX
FIQFX vs GSAFX Comparison
Open Charts FIQFX vs GSAFX
Fidelity Advisor China Region Z
Price$55.44
Change+$0.03 (+0.05%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.81B
Goldman Sachs China Equity R6
Price$28.46
Change-$0.08 (-0.28%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets41.63M
FIQFX vs GSAFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FIQFX vs. GSAFX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FIQFX is a Hold and GSAFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FIQFX has more cash in the bank: 1.81B vs. GSAFX (41.6M). GSAFX pays higher dividends than FIQFX: GSAFX (1.20) vs FIQFX (1.09). FIQFX was incepted earlier than GSAFX: FIQFX (7 years) vs GSAFX (8 years). GSAFX (1.93) is less costly to investors than FIQFX (0.77). GSAFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 70.00 vs. FIQFX (30.00). FIQFX has a lower initial minimum investment than GSAFX: FIQFX (0) vs GSAFX (5000000). FIQFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 40.95 vs. GSAFX (32.47). FIQFX return over 5 years is better than : 8.01 vs. GSAFX (-28.96).
| FIQFX | GSAFX | FIQFX / GSAFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.77 | 1.09 | 71% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.77 | 1.93 | 40% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 43.773 | 34.563 | 127% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 5000000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.81B | 41.6M | 4,358% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.09 | 1.20 | 91% |
| Returns for 1 year | 40.95 | 32.47 | 126% |
| Returns for 3 years | 94.24 | 36.97 | 255% |
| Returns for 5 years | 8.01 | -28.96 | -28% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement