Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FIQFX vs GSAFX
FIQFX vs GSAFX Comparison
Open Charts FIQFX vs GSAFX
Fidelity Advisor China Region Z
Price$57.89
Change-$0.04 (-0.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.79B
Goldman Sachs China Equity R6
Price$29.22
Change+$0.02 (+0.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets42.32M
FIQFX vs GSAFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FIQFX vs. GSAFX commentary
Jan 15, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FIQFX is a Hold and GSAFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FIQFX has more cash in the bank: 1.79B vs. GSAFX (42.3M). FIQFX pays higher dividends than GSAFX: FIQFX (2.07) vs GSAFX (1.54). FIQFX was incepted earlier than GSAFX: FIQFX (7 years) vs GSAFX (8 years). GSAFX (1.93) is less costly to investors than FIQFX (0.77). GSAFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 70.00 vs. FIQFX (30.00). FIQFX has a lower initial minimum investment than GSAFX: FIQFX (0) vs GSAFX (5000000). FIQFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 57.42 vs. GSAFX (44.70). FIQFX return over 5 years is better than : 4.95 vs. GSAFX (-30.92).
| FIQFX | GSAFX | FIQFX / GSAFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.77 | 1.09 | 71% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.77 | 1.93 | 40% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.497 | 5.602 | 134% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 5000000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.79B | 42.3M | 4,234% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.07 | 1.54 | 135% |
| Returns for 1 year | 57.42 | 44.70 | 128% |
| Returns for 3 years | 67.36 | 16.17 | 417% |
| Returns for 5 years | 4.95 | -30.92 | -16% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement