Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FIQFX vs GSACX
FIQFX vs GSACX Comparison
Open Charts FIQFX vs GSACX
Fidelity Advisor China Region Z
Price$57.89
Change-$0.04 (-0.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.79B
Goldman Sachs China Equity C
Price$23.28
Change+$0.01 (+0.04%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets42.37M
FIQFX vs GSACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FIQFX vs. GSACX commentary
Jan 15, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FIQFX is a Hold and GSACX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FIQFX has more cash in the bank: 1.79B vs. GSACX (42.4M). FIQFX pays higher dividends than GSACX: FIQFX (2.07) vs GSACX (1.31). FIQFX was incepted earlier than GSACX: FIQFX (7 years) vs GSACX (28 years). GSACX (3.05) is less costly to investors than FIQFX (0.77). GSACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 70.00 vs. FIQFX (30.00). FIQFX has a lower initial minimum investment than GSACX: FIQFX (0) vs GSACX (1000). FIQFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 57.42 vs. GSACX (43.05). FIQFX return over 5 years is better than : 4.95 vs. GSACX (-35.48).
| FIQFX | GSACX | FIQFX / GSACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.77 | 2.21 | 35% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.77 | 3.05 | 25% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 28 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.497 | 5.578 | 134% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.79B | 42.4M | 4,224% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.07 | 1.31 | 159% |
| Returns for 1 year | 57.42 | 43.05 | 133% |
| Returns for 3 years | 67.36 | 12.39 | 543% |
| Returns for 5 years | 4.95 | -35.48 | -14% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 40.28 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement