Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FIQFX vs GMEPX
FIQFX vs GMEPX Comparison
Open Charts FIQFX vs GMEPX
Fidelity Advisor China Region Z
Price$59.78
Change+$3.88 (+6.94%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.07B
Goldman Sachs China Equity P
Price$28.87
Change-$0.56 (-1.90%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets42.18M
FIQFX vs GMEPX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FIQFX vs. GMEPX commentary
Feb 05, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FIQFX is a Hold and GMEPX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FIQFX has more cash in the bank: 2.07B vs. GMEPX (42.2M). FIQFX pays higher dividends than GMEPX: FIQFX (1.87) vs GMEPX (1.46). FIQFX was incepted earlier than GMEPX: FIQFX (7 years) vs GMEPX (8 years). GMEPX (1.93) is less costly to investors than FIQFX (0.77). GMEPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 63.00 vs. FIQFX (34.00). GMEPX has a lower initial minimum investment than FIQFX: GMEPX (0) vs FIQFX (250). FIQFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 57.17 vs. GMEPX (36.65). FIQFX return over 5 years is better than : 2.72 vs. GMEPX (-36.41).
| FIQFX | GMEPX | FIQFX / GMEPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.77 | 1.09 | 71% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.77 | 1.93 | 40% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.930 | 4.299 | 254% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.07B | 42.2M | 4,905% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.87 | 1.46 | 128% |
| Returns for 1 year | 57.17 | 36.65 | 156% |
| Returns for 3 years | 72.89 | 17.42 | 418% |
| Returns for 5 years | 2.72 | -36.41 | -7% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |