FIP vs TRC
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FIP is a Hold and TRC is a Hold.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
FIP’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TRC’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
- FIP’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 2 bearish.
- TRC’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
| FIP | TRC | FIP / TRC | |
| Capitalization | 652M | 413M | 158% |
| EBITDA | 23.3M | 1.11M | 2,105% |
| Gain YTD | 130.230 | 0.930 | 14,000% |
| P/E Ratio | N/A | 128.00 | - |
| Revenue | 320M | 44.7M | 716% |
| Total Cash | 29.4M | 64.5M | 46% |
| Total Debt | 1.41B | 47.9M | 2,946% |
TRC | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 10 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 88 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 89 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 60 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 1 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| FIP | TRC | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | about 1 month ago 0% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | N/A | about 1 month ago 0% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | about 1 month ago 0% | about 1 month ago 0% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | about 1 month ago 0% | about 1 month ago 0% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | about 1 month ago 0% | about 1 month ago 0% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | about 1 month ago 0% | about 1 month ago 0% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | about 2 months ago 0% | about 1 month ago 0% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | about 2 months ago 65% | about 2 months ago 0% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | about 1 month ago 0% | about 1 month ago 0% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | about 1 month ago 0% | about 1 month ago 0% |
FIP and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FIP has been loosely correlated with MLI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 37% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FIP jumps, then MLI could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FIP | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FIP | 100% | -10.97% | ||
| MLI - FIP | 37% Loosely correlated | -5.64% | ||
| TRC - FIP | 36% Loosely correlated | -2.96% | ||
| IIIN - FIP | 34% Loosely correlated | -5.26% | ||
| CODI - FIP | 34% Loosely correlated | -3.61% | ||
| NWPX - FIP | 33% Poorly correlated | -3.43% | ||
More | ||||
TRC and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TRC has been loosely correlated with CODI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 50% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if TRC jumps, then CODI could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To TRC | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TRC | 100% | -2.96% | ||
| CODI - TRC | 50% Loosely correlated | -3.61% | ||
| MDU - TRC | 42% Loosely correlated | -1.48% | ||
| IIIN - TRC | 41% Loosely correlated | -5.26% | ||
| MATW - TRC | 39% Loosely correlated | -3.40% | ||
| TUSK - TRC | 38% Loosely correlated | -5.24% | ||
More | ||||