Advertisement
FIP vs MLI
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FIP is a Hold and MLI is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
FIP’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileMLI’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
- FIP’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- MLI’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
FIP’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MLI’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
- FIP’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
- MLI’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
FIP (@Industrial Conglomerates) experienced а +8.18% price change this week, while MLI (@Metal Fabrication) price change was +7.97% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Industrial Conglomerates industry was +1.07%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.83%, and the average quarterly price growth was +24.33%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Metal Fabrication industry was -0.70%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.60%, and the average quarterly price growth was +16.41%.
Reported Earning Dates
FIP is expected to report earnings on Feb 26, 2026.
MLI is expected to report earnings on Feb 10, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Industrial Conglomerates (+1.07% weekly)Industrial Conglomerates specialize in numerous types of products, most of which comprise industrial goods, while some also go towards meeting household needs. Honeywell (makes engineering services and aerospace systems), United Technologies Corporation(manufactures aircraft engines, aerospace systems, HVAC, elevators and escalators, fire and security, building systems, and industrial products, among others), 3M (over 60,000 products under several world-renowned brands, including adhesives, abrasives, laminates, passive fire protection, personal protective equipment, window films, paint protection films, dental and orthodontic products, electrical & electronic connecting and insulating materials, medical products, car-care products, electronic circuits, healthcare software and optical films).
@Metal Fabrication (-0.70% weekly)The industry is involved in value-added processes including creation of metal structures like machines and parts by cutting, bending and assembling, using various raw materials. A fabrication shop often bids on a project/job, and then builds the product if awarded the contract. Robotics and automation are making their way into the industry apparently to fill in skills gap[s19] . RBC Bearings Incorporated, Timken Company and Valmont Industries, Inc. are some of the largest metal fabrication companies in the U.S.
| FIP | MLI | FIP / MLI | |
| Capitalization | 630M | 14.3B | 4% |
| EBITDA | 109M | 1.07B | 10% |
| Gain YTD | 17.570 | 11.995 | 146% |
| P/E Ratio | N/A | 19.22 | - |
| Revenue | 440M | 4.14B | 11% |
| Total Cash | 34.7M | N/A | - |
| Total Debt | 3.8B | 28.9M | 13,138% |
MLI | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 30 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 42 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 5 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 36 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 39 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 27 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| FIP | MLI | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 67% | 2 days ago 52% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 72% | 2 days ago 48% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 79% | 14 days ago 76% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | 2 days ago 78% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% | 2 days ago 72% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% | 2 days ago 72% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | 2 days ago 71% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 77% | 16 days ago 53% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% | 2 days ago 58% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% | 2 days ago 69% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| TVC | 24.24 | -0.01 | -0.04% |
| Tennessee Valley Authority Power Bonds 1998 Series D due June 1 2028 | |||
| FWD | 112.06 | -0.75 | -0.66% |
| AB Disruptors ETF | |||
| LCF | 42.51 | -0.39 | -0.91% |
| Touchstone US Large Cap Focused ETF | |||
| EOD | 5.94 | -0.06 | -1.00% |
| Allspring Global Dividend Opportunity Fund | |||
| LRCU | 97.92 | -4.80 | -4.68% |
| Tradr 2X Long LRCX Daily ETF | |||
FIP and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FIP has been loosely correlated with MLI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 37% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FIP jumps, then MLI could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FIP | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FIP | 100% | +3.44% | ||
| MLI - FIP | 37% Loosely correlated | +2.03% | ||
| MATW - FIP | 35% Loosely correlated | +1.53% | ||
| IIIN - FIP | 34% Loosely correlated | +0.48% | ||
| CODI - FIP | 34% Loosely correlated | +3.06% | ||
| NWPX - FIP | 33% Poorly correlated | +0.89% | ||
More | ||||
MLI and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MLI has been loosely correlated with ESAB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 61% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MLI jumps, then ESAB could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To MLI | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MLI | 100% | +2.03% | ||
| ESAB - MLI | 61% Loosely correlated | +0.65% | ||
| PRLB - MLI | 57% Loosely correlated | -0.68% | ||
| MTUS - MLI | 51% Loosely correlated | +4.50% | ||
| WOR - MLI | 50% Loosely correlated | +0.85% | ||
| ZEUS - MLI | 49% Loosely correlated | +2.37% | ||
More | ||||