It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
FINV’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileQD’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
FINV’s TA Score shows that 1 TA indicator(s) are bullish while QD’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).
FINV (@Finance/Rental/Leasing) experienced а -7.62% price change this week, while QD (@Finance/Rental/Leasing) price change was -3.77% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Finance/Rental/Leasing industry was -0.26%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.85%, and the average quarterly price growth was +19.91%.
FINV is expected to report earnings on Nov 18, 2024.
QD is expected to report earnings on Nov 18, 2024.
A leasing company (e.g. United Rentals, Inc. ) is typically the legal owner of the asset for the duration of the lease, while the lessee has operating control over the asset while also having some share of the economic risks and returns from the change in the valuation of the underlying asset. Per capita disposable income and corporate earnings or cash flow could be some of the critical metrics for this business – the higher the values of these metrics, the potentially greater ability of consumers/businesses to afford apartments/office spaces for rent. Other finance companies include credit/debit card payment processing companies (e.g. Visa Inc. and Mastercard), private label credit cards providers (e.g. Synchrony Financial) and automobile finance companies (e.g. Credit Acceptance Corporation).
FINV | QD | FINV / QD | |
Capitalization | 1.41B | 562M | 251% |
EBITDA | 2.49B | -339.48M | -733% |
Gain YTD | 24.686 | 12.745 | 194% |
P/E Ratio | 4.34 | 19.77 | 22% |
Revenue | 12.5B | 398M | 3,141% |
Total Cash | 8.53B | 8.79B | 97% |
Total Debt | 160M | 9.37M | 1,708% |
FINV | QD | ||
---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 84 | 17 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 22 Undervalued | 68 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 50 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 50 | 88 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 49 | 41 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 42 | 4 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
FINV's Valuation (22) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for QD (68) in the Internet Software Or Services industry. This means that FINV’s stock grew somewhat faster than QD’s over the last 12 months.
FINV's Profit vs Risk Rating (50) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for QD (100) in the Internet Software Or Services industry. This means that FINV’s stock grew somewhat faster than QD’s over the last 12 months.
FINV's SMR Rating (50) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for QD (88) in the Internet Software Or Services industry. This means that FINV’s stock grew somewhat faster than QD’s over the last 12 months.
QD's Price Growth Rating (41) in the Internet Software Or Services industry is in the same range as FINV (49) in the null industry. This means that QD’s stock grew similarly to FINV’s over the last 12 months.
QD's P/E Growth Rating (4) in the Internet Software Or Services industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FINV (42) in the null industry. This means that QD’s stock grew somewhat faster than FINV’s over the last 12 months.
FINV | QD | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago77% | 2 days ago84% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago68% | 2 days ago84% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago64% | 2 days ago81% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago70% | 2 days ago83% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago81% | 2 days ago79% |
Advances ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago74% | 2 days ago85% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago83% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FINV has been loosely correlated with LU. These tickers have moved in lockstep 38% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FINV jumps, then LU could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FINV | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
FINV | 100% | -2.02% | ||
LU - FINV | 38% Loosely correlated | -3.32% | ||
YRD - FINV | 32% Poorly correlated | -0.84% | ||
BFH - FINV | 32% Poorly correlated | +0.73% | ||
GSL - FINV | 31% Poorly correlated | -2.46% | ||
QFIN - FINV | 31% Poorly correlated | -3.26% | ||
More |
A.I.dvisor tells us that QD and FINV have been poorly correlated (+29% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that QD and FINV's prices will move in lockstep.