FINV
Price
$7.88
Change
+$0.11 (+1.41%)
Updated
Sep 5, 02:06 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
1.97B
80 days until earnings call
QD
Price
$4.46
Change
-$0.04 (-0.89%)
Updated
Sep 5, 02:29 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
741.42M
Interact to see
Advertisement

FINV vs QD

Header iconFINV vs QD Comparison
Open Charts FINV vs QDBanner chart's image
FinVolution Group
Price$7.88
Change+$0.11 (+1.41%)
Volume$1.24K
Capitalization1.97B
Qudian
Price$4.46
Change-$0.04 (-0.89%)
Volume$1.8K
Capitalization741.42M
FINV vs QD Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
FINV
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
QD
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FINV vs. QD commentary
Sep 05, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FINV is a Buy and QD is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 05, 2025
Stock price -- (FINV: $7.78 vs. QD: $4.49)
Brand notoriety: FINV: Not notable vs. QD: Notable
Both companies represent the Savings Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FINV: 91% vs. QD: 63%
Market capitalization -- FINV: $1.97B vs. QD: $741.42M
FINV [@Savings Banks] is valued at $1.97B. QD’s [@Savings Banks] market capitalization is $741.42M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Savings Banks] industry ranges from $681.25B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Savings Banks] industry is $22.54B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FINV’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileQD’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • FINV’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • QD’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, FINV is a better buy in the long-term than QD.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FINV’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while QD’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FINV’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • QD’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both FINV and QD are a bad buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

FINV (@Savings Banks) experienced а -6.83% price change this week, while QD (@Savings Banks) price change was -1.97% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Savings Banks industry was -0.52%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.05%, and the average quarterly price growth was +29.06%.

Reported Earning Dates

FINV is expected to report earnings on Nov 24, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Savings Banks (-0.52% weekly)

A savings bank primary function is to take deposits and paying interest on those deposits. Originating in Europe during the 18th century, these banks were generally introduced to incentivize people of all stripes to save money and park them with banks. By the 1990s, the internet ushered in online savings banks that allowed savers to deposit/transact with banks digitally, without requiring to visit a branch office. Savings banks have potentially encouraged lower-income population to save and have access to a financial institution to earn interest on their money. New York Community Bancorp, Inc, Webster Financial Corporation, Washington Federal, Inc. are examples of savings banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FINV($1.97B) has a higher market cap than QD($741M). QD has higher P/E ratio than FINV: QD (18.42) vs FINV (5.22). QD YTD gains are higher at: 59.220 vs. FINV (18.908). FINV has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 2.79B vs. QD (167M). QD (8.64B) and FINV (8.46B) have equal amount of cash in the bank . FINV has less debt than QD: FINV (59M) vs QD (732M). FINV has higher revenues than QD: FINV (13.4B) vs QD (186M).
FINVQDFINV / QD
Capitalization1.97B741M266%
EBITDA2.79B167M1,671%
Gain YTD18.90859.22032%
P/E Ratio5.2218.4228%
Revenue13.4B186M7,204%
Total Cash8.46B8.64B98%
Total Debt59M732M8%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FINV vs QD: Fundamental Ratings
FINV
QD
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5977
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
18
Undervalued
79
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
4346
SMR RATING
1..100
4989
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5336
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
3496
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FINV's Valuation (18) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for QD (79) in the Internet Software Or Services industry. This means that FINV’s stock grew somewhat faster than QD’s over the last 12 months.

FINV's Profit vs Risk Rating (43) in the null industry is in the same range as QD (46) in the Internet Software Or Services industry. This means that FINV’s stock grew similarly to QD’s over the last 12 months.

FINV's SMR Rating (49) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for QD (89) in the Internet Software Or Services industry. This means that FINV’s stock grew somewhat faster than QD’s over the last 12 months.

QD's Price Growth Rating (36) in the Internet Software Or Services industry is in the same range as FINV (53) in the null industry. This means that QD’s stock grew similarly to FINV’s over the last 12 months.

FINV's P/E Growth Rating (34) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for QD (96) in the Internet Software Or Services industry. This means that FINV’s stock grew somewhat faster than QD’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FINVQD
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
75%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
66%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
76%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 15 days ago
83%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
78%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
78%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
82%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FINV
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
QD
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
RTSAX40.740.60
+1.49%
Russell Inv Tax-Managed US Mid&Sm Cap A
SLVCX18.550.19
+1.03%
Saratoga Large Capitalization Value C
ALSAX10.530.09
+0.86%
Alger Small Cap Growth A
MITDX39.170.32
+0.82%
MFS Massachusetts Investors Tr R4
IEGCX21.850.10
+0.46%
Invesco International Small Company C

FINV and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FINV has been loosely correlated with QFIN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 64% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FINV jumps, then QFIN could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FINV
1D Price
Change %
FINV100%
-3.23%
QFIN - FINV
64%
Loosely correlated
-0.86%
LX - FINV
53%
Loosely correlated
-0.99%
YRD - FINV
52%
Loosely correlated
-1.86%
LU - FINV
49%
Loosely correlated
-3.58%
XYF - FINV
40%
Loosely correlated
-2.41%
More

QD and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, QD has been loosely correlated with QFIN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 42% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if QD jumps, then QFIN could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To QD
1D Price
Change %
QD100%
-5.07%
QFIN - QD
42%
Loosely correlated
-0.86%
FINV - QD
37%
Loosely correlated
-3.23%
LX - QD
36%
Loosely correlated
-0.99%
YRD - QD
33%
Poorly correlated
-1.86%
LU - QD
32%
Poorly correlated
-3.58%
More