FINV
Price
$9.54
Change
+$0.01 (+0.10%)
Updated
Jun 27 closing price
Capitalization
1.41B
57 days until earnings call
LU
Price
$2.74
Change
-$0.05 (-1.79%)
Updated
Jun 27 closing price
Capitalization
5.09B
58 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

FINV vs LU

Header iconFINV vs LU Comparison
Open Charts FINV vs LUBanner chart's image
FinVolution Group
Price$9.54
Change+$0.01 (+0.10%)
Volume$726.39K
Capitalization1.41B
Lufax Holding
Price$2.74
Change-$0.05 (-1.79%)
Volume$2.08M
Capitalization5.09B
FINV vs LU Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
FINV
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
LU
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FINV vs. LU commentary
Jun 29, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FINV is a Buy and LU is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 29, 2025
Stock price -- (FINV: $9.54 vs. LU: $2.74)
Brand notoriety: FINV and LU are both not notable
Both companies represent the Finance/Rental/Leasing industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FINV: 60% vs. LU: 61%
Market capitalization -- FINV: $1.41B vs. LU: $5.09B
FINV [@Finance/Rental/Leasing] is valued at $1.41B. LU’s [@Finance/Rental/Leasing] market capitalization is $5.09B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Finance/Rental/Leasing] industry ranges from $573.25B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Finance/Rental/Leasing] industry is $13.11B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FINV’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileLU’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • FINV’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • LU’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, FINV is a better buy in the long-term than LU.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FINV’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while LU’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FINV’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • LU’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FINV is a better buy in the short-term than LU.

Price Growth

FINV (@Finance/Rental/Leasing) experienced а +3.14% price change this week, while LU (@Finance/Rental/Leasing) price change was -1.79% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Finance/Rental/Leasing industry was +3.75%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.33%, and the average quarterly price growth was +17.92%.

Reported Earning Dates

FINV is expected to report earnings on Aug 25, 2025.

LU is expected to report earnings on Aug 26, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Finance/Rental/Leasing (+3.75% weekly)

A leasing company (e.g. United Rentals, Inc. ) is typically the legal owner of the asset for the duration of the lease, while the lessee has operating control over the asset while also having some share of the economic risks and returns from the change in the valuation of the underlying asset. Per capita disposable income and corporate earnings or cash flow could be some of the critical metrics for this business – the higher the values of these metrics, the potentially greater ability of consumers/businesses to afford apartments/office spaces for rent. Other finance companies include credit/debit card payment processing companies (e.g. Visa Inc. and Mastercard), private label credit cards providers (e.g. Synchrony Financial) and automobile finance companies (e.g. Credit Acceptance Corporation).

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
LU($5.09B) has a higher market cap than FINV($1.41B). LU has higher P/E ratio than FINV: LU (19.53) vs FINV (4.34). FINV YTD gains are higher at: 45.808 vs. LU (14.644). FINV has less debt than LU: FINV (160M) vs LU (43.1B). LU has higher revenues than FINV: LU (32B) vs FINV (12.5B).
FINVLUFINV / LU
Capitalization1.41B5.09B28%
EBITDA2.49BN/A-
Gain YTD45.80814.644313%
P/E Ratio4.3419.5322%
Revenue12.5B32B39%
Total Cash8.53BN/A-
Total Debt160M43.1B0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FINV: Fundamental Ratings
FINV
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
9
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
32
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
29
SMR RATING
1..100
50
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
39
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
14
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FINVLU
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
78%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
86%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
88%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
84%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
79%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
83%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
86%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
82%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
87%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
83%
Bullish Trend 13 days ago
77%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
71%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
86%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
75%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
82%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
86%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FINV
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
LU
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
HWAAX39.990.27
+0.68%
Hotchkis & Wiley Value Opps A
PSBJX24.270.08
+0.33%
Principal SmallCap J
FTZCX52.320.16
+0.31%
FullerThaler Behvrll Uncnstd Eq C
SDFSX17.470.03
+0.17%
Sit Small Cap Dividend Growth S
UBVUX81.13-0.01
-0.01%
Undiscovered Managers Behavioral Val R4

FINV and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FINV has been loosely correlated with LX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 55% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FINV jumps, then LX could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FINV
1D Price
Change %
FINV100%
+0.10%
LX - FINV
55%
Loosely correlated
-2.21%
YRD - FINV
54%
Loosely correlated
-1.35%
LU - FINV
45%
Loosely correlated
-1.79%
XYF - FINV
38%
Loosely correlated
-1.43%
QD - FINV
36%
Loosely correlated
+8.42%
More

LU and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LU has been loosely correlated with QFIN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 48% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if LU jumps, then QFIN could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LU
1D Price
Change %
LU100%
-1.79%
QFIN - LU
48%
Loosely correlated
-0.58%
FINV - LU
45%
Loosely correlated
+0.10%
YRD - LU
39%
Loosely correlated
-1.35%
LX - LU
38%
Loosely correlated
-2.21%
DWAY - LU
29%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More