FINV
Price
$8.94
Change
-$0.29 (-3.14%)
Updated
Aug 11, 02:19 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
2.34B
14 days until earnings call
LU
Price
$2.81
Change
-$0.02 (-0.71%)
Updated
Aug 11, 04:48 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
2.41B
15 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

FINV vs LU

Header iconFINV vs LU Comparison
Open Charts FINV vs LUBanner chart's image
FinVolution Group
Price$8.94
Change-$0.29 (-3.14%)
Volume$110
Capitalization2.34B
Lufax Holding
Price$2.81
Change-$0.02 (-0.71%)
Volume$100
Capitalization2.41B
FINV vs LU Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
FINV
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
LU
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FINV vs. LU commentary
Aug 11, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FINV is a Hold and LU is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 11, 2025
Stock price -- (FINV: $9.23 vs. LU: $2.83)
Brand notoriety: FINV and LU are both not notable
Both companies represent the Savings Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FINV: 82% vs. LU: 51%
Market capitalization -- FINV: $2.34B vs. LU: $2.41B
FINV [@Savings Banks] is valued at $2.34B. LU’s [@Savings Banks] market capitalization is $2.41B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Savings Banks] industry ranges from $653.67B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Savings Banks] industry is $21.16B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FINV’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileLU’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • FINV’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • LU’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, FINV is a better buy in the long-term than LU.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FINV’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while LU’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FINV’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • LU’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 8 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FINV is a better buy in the short-term than LU.

Price Growth

FINV (@Savings Banks) experienced а +12.01% price change this week, while LU (@Savings Banks) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Savings Banks industry was +0.16%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.49%, and the average quarterly price growth was +20.13%.

Reported Earning Dates

FINV is expected to report earnings on Aug 25, 2025.

LU is expected to report earnings on Aug 26, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Savings Banks (+0.16% weekly)

A savings bank primary function is to take deposits and paying interest on those deposits. Originating in Europe during the 18th century, these banks were generally introduced to incentivize people of all stripes to save money and park them with banks. By the 1990s, the internet ushered in online savings banks that allowed savers to deposit/transact with banks digitally, without requiring to visit a branch office. Savings banks have potentially encouraged lower-income population to save and have access to a financial institution to earn interest on their money. New York Community Bancorp, Inc, Webster Financial Corporation, Washington Federal, Inc. are examples of savings banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
LU($2.41B) and FINV($2.34B) have the same market capitalization . LU has higher P/E ratio than FINV: LU (20.61) vs FINV (6.66). FINV YTD gains are higher at: 41.070 vs. LU (18.410). FINV has less debt than LU: FINV (59M) vs LU (47.6B). LU has higher revenues than FINV: LU (20.3B) vs FINV (13.4B).
FINVLUFINV / LU
Capitalization2.34B2.41B97%
EBITDA2.79BN/A-
Gain YTD41.07018.410223%
P/E Ratio6.6620.6132%
Revenue13.4B20.3B66%
Total Cash8.46BN/A-
Total Debt59M47.6B0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FINV: Fundamental Ratings
FINV
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
50
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
29
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
34
SMR RATING
1..100
50
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
45
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
22
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
90

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FINVLU
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
63%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
73%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
78%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
84%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
86%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
63%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
81%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
83%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
76%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
74%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
83%
Bullish Trend 19 days ago
76%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 13 days ago
71%
Bearish Trend 13 days ago
86%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
84%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
87%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
76%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
85%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FINV
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
LU
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
PBFDX34.770.33
+0.96%
Payson Total Return
SGNFX51.130.43
+0.85%
Sparrow Growth No-Load
VWNEX72.140.47
+0.66%
Vanguard Windsor™ Admiral™
FFAQX17.380.08
+0.46%
Franklin Global Allocation R6
MWOFX64.210.24
+0.38%
MFS Global Growth A

FINV and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FINV has been loosely correlated with QFIN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 63% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FINV jumps, then QFIN could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FINV
1D Price
Change %
FINV100%
+3.36%
QFIN - FINV
63%
Loosely correlated
+0.09%
LX - FINV
53%
Loosely correlated
-0.31%
YRD - FINV
52%
Loosely correlated
-0.35%
LU - FINV
46%
Loosely correlated
+0.35%
XYF - FINV
39%
Loosely correlated
-3.62%
More

LU and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LU has been loosely correlated with LX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 47% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if LU jumps, then LX could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LU
1D Price
Change %
LU100%
+0.35%
LX - LU
47%
Loosely correlated
-0.31%
YRD - LU
47%
Loosely correlated
-0.35%
QFIN - LU
47%
Loosely correlated
+0.09%
FINV - LU
45%
Loosely correlated
+3.36%
QD - LU
32%
Poorly correlated
+2.68%
More