Advertisement
FINGF vs POOL
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FINGF is a Hold and POOL is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
FINGF’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whilePOOL’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
- FINGF’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
- POOL’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
FINGF’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while POOL’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
- FINGF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 6 bearish.
- POOL’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
FINGF (@Electronics Distributors) experienced а +4.25% price change this week, while POOL (@Electronics Distributors) price change was -0.98% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Electronics Distributors industry was -1.79%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -4.23%, and the average quarterly price growth was +7.15%.
Reported Earning Dates
POOL is expected to report earnings on Feb 12, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Electronics Distributors (-1.79% weekly)Electronics distributors are companies that are involved in distribution of one or more of the following: electronic components, computer products/ peripherals and software products & services. Several electronics distributors are also becoming the point of contact for technical/pre- & post-sale support in many cases, in an attempt to bolster their position in the market. Tariffs and/or cross-border trade barriers are some of the potential threats to the electronics supply chain, but that could also potentially lead to re-directing to markets where tariffs/restrictions are lower depending on demand. The industry is also vulnerable in the event of economic slowdowns. Arrow Electronics, Inc., SYNNEX Corporation and Versum Materials, Inc. are some of the major electronics distributors in the U.S.
| FINGF | POOL | FINGF / POOL | |
| Capitalization | 6.93B | 9.16B | 76% |
| EBITDA | 1.21B | 635M | 190% |
| Gain YTD | 102.612 | -25.677 | -400% |
| P/E Ratio | 17.60 | 22.42 | 79% |
| Revenue | 11.4B | 5.28B | 216% |
| Total Cash | 431M | 83.7M | 515% |
| Total Debt | 2.55B | 1.55B | 164% |
FINGF | POOL | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 27 | 52 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 32 Undervalued | 33 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 17 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 39 | 32 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 38 | 65 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 10 | 76 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
FINGF's Valuation (32) in the null industry is in the same range as POOL (33) in the Wholesale Distributors industry. This means that FINGF’s stock grew similarly to POOL’s over the last 12 months.
FINGF's Profit vs Risk Rating (17) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for POOL (100) in the Wholesale Distributors industry. This means that FINGF’s stock grew significantly faster than POOL’s over the last 12 months.
POOL's SMR Rating (32) in the Wholesale Distributors industry is in the same range as FINGF (39) in the null industry. This means that POOL’s stock grew similarly to FINGF’s over the last 12 months.
FINGF's Price Growth Rating (38) in the null industry is in the same range as POOL (65) in the Wholesale Distributors industry. This means that FINGF’s stock grew similarly to POOL’s over the last 12 months.
FINGF's P/E Growth Rating (10) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for POOL (76) in the Wholesale Distributors industry. This means that FINGF’s stock grew significantly faster than POOL’s over the last 12 months.
| FINGF | POOL | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 53% | 3 days ago 81% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 58% | 3 days ago 67% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 66% | 3 days ago 78% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 61% | 3 days ago 69% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 67% | 3 days ago 66% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 66% | 3 days ago 70% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 64% | 25 days ago 60% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 9 days ago 63% | 9 days ago 66% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 58% | 3 days ago 73% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 76% | 3 days ago 68% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| OCFS | 28.27 | N/A | N/A |
| Otter Creek Focus Strategy ETF | |||
| JMHI | 50.43 | -0.07 | -0.14% |
| JPMorgan High Yield Municipal ETF | |||
| TYD | 25.95 | -0.21 | -0.79% |
| Direxion Daily 7-10 Yr Trs Bull 3X ETF | |||
| TOUS | 34.15 | -0.40 | -1.16% |
| T. Rowe Price International Equity ETF | |||
| FETH | 31.60 | -2.46 | -7.22% |
| Fidelity Ethereum Fund | |||
FINGF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FINGF has been loosely correlated with WCC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 36% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FINGF jumps, then WCC could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FINGF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FINGF | 100% | -5.16% | ||
| WCC - FINGF | 36% Loosely correlated | -3.42% | ||
| SITE - FINGF | 35% Loosely correlated | +0.48% | ||
| AIT - FINGF | 35% Loosely correlated | -2.10% | ||
| BXC - FINGF | 34% Loosely correlated | -3.67% | ||
| POOL - FINGF | 33% Poorly correlated | -1.84% | ||
More | ||||
POOL and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, POOL has been closely correlated with SITE. These tickers have moved in lockstep 66% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if POOL jumps, then SITE could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To POOL | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| POOL | 100% | -1.48% | ||
| SITE - POOL | 66% Closely correlated | +0.92% | ||
| BXC - POOL | 56% Loosely correlated | -0.79% | ||
| MSM - POOL | 54% Loosely correlated | +0.19% | ||
| WSO - POOL | 49% Loosely correlated | -1.28% | ||
| FERG - POOL | 49% Loosely correlated | -0.39% | ||
More | ||||