Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FIMKX vs RNWBX
FIMKX vs RNWBX Comparison
Open Charts FIMKX vs RNWBX
Fidelity Advisor Focused Em Mkts I
Price$47.52
Change+$5.87 (+14.09%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets10.89B
American Funds New World R2
Price$94.05
Change+$2.72 (+2.98%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets75.46B
FIMKX vs RNWBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FIMKX vs. RNWBX commentary
Feb 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FIMKX is a Hold and RNWBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWBX has more cash in the bank: 75.5B vs. FIMKX (10.9B). FIMKX pays higher dividends than RNWBX: FIMKX (1.42) vs RNWBX (0.45). FIMKX was incepted earlier than RNWBX: FIMKX (22 years) vs RNWBX (24 years). RNWBX (1.66) is less costly to investors than FIMKX (0.91). FIMKX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 58.00 vs. RNWBX (46.00). FIMKX has a lower initial minimum investment than RNWBX: FIMKX (0) vs RNWBX (250). FIMKX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 53.23 vs. RNWBX (26.27). FIMKX return over 5 years is better than : 27.21 vs. RNWBX (7.03).
| FIMKX | RNWBX | FIMKX / RNWBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 1.66 | 55% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 1.66 | 55% |
| Fund Existence | 22 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.400 | 5.996 | 173% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 500 | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 10.9B | 75.5B | 14% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.42 | 0.45 | 315% |
| Returns for 1 year | 53.23 | 26.27 | 203% |
| Returns for 3 years | 68.66 | 38.81 | 177% |
| Returns for 5 years | 27.21 | 7.03 | 387% |
| Returns for 10 years | 172.21 | 114.19 | 151% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers