Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FIKZX vs RLBAX
FIKZX vs RLBAX Comparison
Open Charts FIKZX vs RLBAX
Fidelity Advisor Asset Manager 50% Z
Price$22.06
Change-$0.01 (-0.05%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets9.62B
American Funds American Balanced R1
Price$37.06
Change-$0.08 (-0.22%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets256.26B
FIKZX vs RLBAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FIKZX vs. RLBAX commentary
Aug 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FIKZX is a StrongBuy and RLBAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBAX has more cash in the bank: 256B vs. FIKZX (9.62B). FIKZX pays higher dividends than RLBAX: FIKZX (2.39) vs RLBAX (1.17). FIKZX was incepted earlier than RLBAX: FIKZX (7 years) vs RLBAX (23 years). RLBAX (1.31) is less costly to investors than FIKZX (0.47). RLBAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. FIKZX (12.00). FIKZX has a lower initial minimum investment than RLBAX: FIKZX (0) vs RLBAX (250). FIKZX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.99 vs. RLBAX (7.15). RLBAX return over 5 years is better than : 33.77 vs. FIKZX (26.52).
| FIKZX | RLBAX | FIKZX / RLBAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.47 | 1.31 | 36% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.47 | 1.31 | 36% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.456 | 9.243 | 102% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 9.62B | 256B | 4% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.39 | 1.17 | 204% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.99 | 7.15 | 126% |
| Returns for 3 years | 19.40 | 27.06 | 72% |
| Returns for 5 years | 26.52 | 33.77 | 79% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 59.12 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement