Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FIKWX vs HBLAX
FIKWX vs HBLAX Comparison
Open Charts FIKWX vs HBLAX
Fidelity Advisor Asset Manager 30% Z
Price$12.96
Change-$0.04 (-0.31%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.23B
Hartford Balanced Income A
Price$14.93
Change+$0.08 (+0.54%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets11.64B
FIKWX vs HBLAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FIKWX vs. HBLAX commentary
Feb 05, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FIKWX is a StrongBuy and HBLAX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HBLAX has more cash in the bank: 11.6B vs. FIKWX (2.23B). HBLAX pays higher dividends than FIKWX: HBLAX (3.21) vs FIKWX (2.92). FIKWX was incepted earlier than HBLAX: FIKWX (7 years) vs HBLAX (20 years). HBLAX (0.89) is less costly to investors than FIKWX (0.50). HBLAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 90.00 vs. FIKWX (24.00). FIKWX has a lower initial minimum investment than HBLAX: FIKWX (0) vs HBLAX (2000). FIKWX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.34 vs. HBLAX (6.72). FIKWX return over 5 years is better than : 18.04 vs. HBLAX (11.47).
| FIKWX | HBLAX | FIKWX / HBLAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.47 | 0.89 | 53% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.50 | 0.89 | 56% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 20 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.721 | 2.612 | 66% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | 2000 | - |
| Net Assets | 2.23B | 11.6B | 19% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.92 | 3.21 | 91% |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.34 | 6.72 | 169% |
| Returns for 3 years | 26.50 | 16.27 | 163% |
| Returns for 5 years | 18.04 | 11.47 | 157% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 52.62 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers