Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FIKVX vs PZRMX
FIKVX vs PZRMX Comparison
Open Charts FIKVX vs PZRMX
Fidelity Advisor Asset Manager 20% Z
Price$14.24
Change-$0.01 (-0.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.56B
PIMCO Inflation Response Multi-Asst A
Price$8.87
Change-$0.02 (-0.22%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.94B
FIKVX vs PZRMX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FIKVX vs. PZRMX commentary
Sep 11, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FIKVX is a Buy and PZRMX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FIKVX has more cash in the bank: 5.56B vs. PZRMX (1.94B). FIKVX pays higher dividends than PZRMX: FIKVX (3.20) vs PZRMX (2.88). FIKVX was incepted earlier than PZRMX: FIKVX (7 years) vs PZRMX (14 years). PZRMX (2.62) is less costly to investors than FIKVX (0.46). PZRMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 322.00 vs. FIKVX (24.00). FIKVX has a lower initial minimum investment than PZRMX: FIKVX (0) vs PZRMX (1000). PZRMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.85 vs. FIKVX (6.94). PZRMX return over 5 years is better than : 41.57 vs. FIKVX (15.57).
| FIKVX | PZRMX | FIKVX / PZRMX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.46 | 2.36 | 19% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.46 | 2.62 | 18% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.309 | 12.139 | 60% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 5.56B | 1.94B | 287% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.20 | 2.88 | 111% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.94 | 11.85 | 59% |
| Returns for 3 years | 17.78 | 22.35 | 80% |
| Returns for 5 years | 15.57 | 41.57 | 37% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 77.21 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement