Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FIKVX vs PZRMX
FIKVX vs PZRMX Comparison
Open Charts FIKVX vs PZRMX
Fidelity Advisor Asset Manager 20% Z
Price$13.97
Change-$0.03 (-0.21%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.51B
PIMCO Inflation Response Multi-Asst A
Price$8.57
Change+$0.04 (+0.47%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.84B
FIKVX vs PZRMX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FIKVX vs. PZRMX commentary
Aug 03, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FIKVX is a Buy and PZRMX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FIKVX has more cash in the bank: 5.51B vs. PZRMX (1.84B). FIKVX pays higher dividends than PZRMX: FIKVX (3.25) vs PZRMX (2.97). FIKVX was incepted earlier than PZRMX: FIKVX (7 years) vs PZRMX (14 years). PZRMX (2.62) is less costly to investors than FIKVX (0.46). PZRMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 322.00 vs. FIKVX (24.00). FIKVX has a lower initial minimum investment than PZRMX: FIKVX (0) vs PZRMX (1000). PZRMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.13 vs. FIKVX (6.18). PZRMX return over 5 years is better than : 38.12 vs. FIKVX (13.31).
| FIKVX | PZRMX | FIKVX / PZRMX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.46 | 2.40 | 19% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.46 | 2.62 | 18% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.918 | 8.347 | 59% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 5.51B | 1.84B | 299% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.25 | 2.97 | 109% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.18 | 9.13 | 68% |
| Returns for 3 years | 13.71 | 15.45 | 89% |
| Returns for 5 years | 13.31 | 38.12 | 35% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 66.88 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement