Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FIKIX vs FRUSX
FIKIX vs FRUSX Comparison
Open Charts FIKIX vs FRUSX
Fidelity Advisor Utilities Z
Price$49.32
Change-$0.17 (-0.34%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.36B
FIKIX vs FRUSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FIKIX vs. FRUSX commentary
Aug 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FIKIX is a Buy and FRUSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FRUSX has more cash in the bank: 7.12B vs. FIKIX (1.36B). FIKIX pays higher dividends than FRUSX: FIKIX (1.86) vs FRUSX (1.77). FIKIX was incepted earlier than FRUSX: FIKIX (7 years) vs FRUSX (30 years). FRUSX (1.21) is less costly to investors than FIKIX (0.60). FIKIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 84.00 vs. FRUSX (6.80). FIKIX has a lower initial minimum investment than FRUSX: FIKIX (0) vs FRUSX (1000). FIKIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.76 vs. FRUSX (12.28). FIKIX return over 5 years is better than : 76.70 vs. FRUSX (32.13).
| FIKIX | FRUSX | FIKIX / FRUSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.60 | 1.21 | 50% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.60 | 1.21 | 50% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 30 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.841 | 12.577 | 86% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.36B | 7.12B | 19% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.86 | 1.77 | 105% |
| Returns for 1 year | 15.76 | 12.28 | 128% |
| Returns for 3 years | 22.78 | 10.34 | 220% |
| Returns for 5 years | 76.70 | 32.13 | 239% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 61.32 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement