Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FIKDX vs RMFEX
FIKDX vs RMFEX Comparison
Open Charts FIKDX vs RMFEX
Kempner Multi-Cap Deep Value Instl
Price$11.80
Change-$0.13 (-1.09%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets92.49M
American Funds American Mutual R4
Price$57.86
Change-$0.45 (-0.77%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets105.76B
FIKDX vs RMFEX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FIKDX vs. RMFEX commentary
Jun 16, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FIKDX is a Buy and RMFEX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFEX has more cash in the bank: 106B vs. FIKDX (92.5M). FIKDX pays higher dividends than RMFEX: FIKDX (2.30) vs RMFEX (1.58). FIKDX was incepted earlier than RMFEX: FIKDX (17 years) vs RMFEX (23 years). FIKDX (0.97) is less costly to investors than RMFEX (0.62). FIKDX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 37.00 vs. RMFEX (31.00). RMFEX has a lower initial minimum investment than FIKDX: RMFEX (250) vs FIKDX (500000). RMFEX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.03 vs. FIKDX (0.87). RMFEX return over 5 years is better than : 62.32 vs. FIKDX (44.00).
| FIKDX | RMFEX | FIKDX / RMFEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.97 | 0.62 | 156% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.97 | 0.62 | 156% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.310 | 6.152 | 54% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 500000 | 250 | 200,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 92.5M | 106B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.30 | 1.58 | 146% |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.87 | 9.03 | 10% |
| Returns for 3 years | 22.30 | 29.63 | 75% |
| Returns for 5 years | 44.00 | 62.32 | 71% |
| Returns for 10 years | 33.51 | 76.27 | 44% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement