Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FIKCX vs FSPHX
FIKCX vs FSPHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FIKCX vs. FSPHX commentary
Dec 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FIKCX is a Buy and FSPHX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSPHX has more cash in the bank: 6.67B vs. FIKCX (3.52B). FSPHX pays higher dividends than FIKCX: FSPHX (0.01) vs FIKCX (0.00). FIKCX was incepted earlier than FSPHX: FIKCX (7 years) vs FSPHX (44 years). FSPHX (0.63) is less costly to investors than FIKCX (0.56). FIKCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 52.00 vs. FSPHX (40.00). FIKCX (0) and FSPHX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FIKCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.37 vs. FSPHX (11.48). FIKCX return over 5 years is better than : 5.14 vs. FSPHX (-2.50).
| FIKCX | FSPHX | FIKCX / FSPHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.56 | 0.63 | 89% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.56 | 0.63 | 89% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 44 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 16.635 | 13.688 | 122% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.52B | 6.67B | 53% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.01 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 14.37 | 11.48 | 125% |
| Returns for 3 years | 16.03 | 13.67 | 117% |
| Returns for 5 years | 5.14 | -2.50 | -206% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 48.01 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement