Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FIKAX vs MLOZX
FIKAX vs MLOZX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FIKAX vs. MLOZX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FIKAX is a Buy and MLOZX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FIKAX has more cash in the bank: 895M vs. MLOZX (122M). MLOZX pays higher dividends than FIKAX: MLOZX (4.36) vs FIKAX (0.97). FIKAX was incepted earlier than MLOZX: FIKAX (7 years) vs MLOZX (12 years). MLOZX (1.30) is less costly to investors than FIKAX (0.58). MLOZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 220.00 vs. FIKAX (15.00). FIKAX (0) and MLOZX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. MLOZX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 18.50 vs. FIKAX (4.09). FIKAX return over 5 years is better than : 235.55 vs. MLOZX (176.89).
| FIKAX | MLOZX | FIKAX / MLOZX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.58 | 0.90 | 64% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.58 | 1.30 | 45% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.255 | 20.751 | 49% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 895M | 122M | 734% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.97 | 4.36 | 22% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.09 | 18.50 | 22% |
| Returns for 3 years | 9.01 | 43.58 | 21% |
| Returns for 5 years | 235.55 | 176.89 | 133% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 121.90 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement