Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FIKAX vs MLOAX
FIKAX vs MLOAX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FIKAX vs. MLOAX commentary
Jun 16, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FIKAX is a Buy and MLOAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FIKAX has more cash in the bank: 897M vs. MLOAX (117M). MLOAX pays higher dividends than FIKAX: MLOAX (4.97) vs FIKAX (1.09). FIKAX was incepted earlier than MLOAX: FIKAX (7 years) vs MLOAX (11 years). MLOAX (1.65) is less costly to investors than FIKAX (0.58). MLOAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 220.00 vs. FIKAX (31.00). FIKAX (0) and MLOAX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. MLOAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.66 vs. FIKAX (0.59). FIKAX return over 5 years is better than : 188.22 vs. MLOAX (129.80).
| FIKAX | MLOAX | FIKAX / MLOAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.58 | 1.25 | 46% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.58 | 1.65 | 35% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.184 | 4.951 | 84% |
| Front Load | N/A | 5% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 897M | 117M | 767% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.09 | 4.97 | 22% |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.59 | 6.66 | 9% |
| Returns for 3 years | 15.22 | 31.75 | 48% |
| Returns for 5 years | 188.22 | 129.80 | 145% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 30.97 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement