Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FIKAX vs HNRGX
FIKAX vs HNRGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FIKAX vs. HNRGX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FIKAX is a Buy and HNRGX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FIKAX has more cash in the bank: 895M vs. HNRGX (13.3M). FIKAX pays higher dividends than HNRGX: FIKAX (0.97) vs HNRGX (0.07). FIKAX was incepted earlier than HNRGX: FIKAX (7 years) vs HNRGX (12 years). HNRGX (2.61) is less costly to investors than FIKAX (0.58). FIKAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 15.00 vs. HNRGX (14.00). FIKAX has a lower initial minimum investment than HNRGX: FIKAX (0) vs HNRGX (2500). HNRGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.51 vs. FIKAX (2.38). HNRGX (239.14) and FIKAX (231.11) have equivalent 5 years return.
| FIKAX | HNRGX | FIKAX / HNRGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.58 | 2.44 | 24% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.58 | 2.61 | 22% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.796 | 11.929 | 74% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 895M | 13.3M | 6,729% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.97 | 0.07 | 1,358% |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.38 | 8.51 | 28% |
| Returns for 3 years | 8.24 | 21.55 | 38% |
| Returns for 5 years | 231.11 | 239.14 | 97% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 106.07 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement