FIHL
Price
$18.22
Change
-$0.30 (-1.62%)
Updated
Sep 27 closing price
51 days until earnings call
SLF
Price
$57.82
Change
-$0.28 (-0.48%)
Updated
Sep 27 closing price
37 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

FIHL vs SLF

Header iconFIHL vs SLF Comparison
Open Charts FIHL vs SLFBanner chart's image
Fidelis Insurance Holdings
Price$18.22
Change-$0.30 (-1.62%)
Volume$350.92K
CapitalizationN/A
Sun Life Financial
Price$57.82
Change-$0.28 (-0.48%)
Volume$781.34K
CapitalizationN/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
FIHL vs SLF Comparison Chart
Loading...
FIHL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
SLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
VS
FIHL vs. SLF commentary
Sep 29, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FIHL is a Hold and SLF is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 29, 2024
Stock price -- (FIHL: $18.21 vs. SLF: $54.81)
Brand notoriety: FIHL and SLF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Multi-Line Insurance industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FIHL: 76% vs. SLF: 143%
Market capitalization -- FIHL: $2.26B vs. SLF: $31.65B
FIHL [@Multi-Line Insurance] is valued at $2.26B. SLF’s [@Multi-Line Insurance] market capitalization is $31.65B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Multi-Line Insurance] industry ranges from $634.15B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Multi-Line Insurance] industry is $21.01B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FIHL’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileSLF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • FIHL’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • SLF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, FIHL is a better buy in the long-term than SLF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FIHL’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SLF’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FIHL’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • SLF’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, SLF is a better buy in the short-term than FIHL.

Price Growth

FIHL (@Multi-Line Insurance) experienced а -1.30% price change this week, while SLF (@Multi-Line Insurance) price change was +0.20% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Multi-Line Insurance industry was +1.46%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.09%, and the average quarterly price growth was +16.58%.

Reported Earning Dates

FIHL is expected to report earnings on Nov 18, 2024.

SLF is expected to report earnings on Nov 04, 2024.

Industries' Descriptions

@Multi-Line Insurance (+1.46% weekly)

A multi-line insurance contract bundles together exposures to risk and covers them under a single contract. For providers of such policies, the bundle is a potential risk diversification strategy since their exposure gets spread over several factors, which helps them mitigate a financial burden if a catastrophic event were to occur. Other potential benefits include getting more premiums from including more than one type of insurance in a bundle, and getting a competitive edge by procuring multiple insurance contracts with a customer. Examples of companies in this industry are Berkshire Hathaway (which owns several insurance companies), Chubb Limited, American International Group, Inc. and Sun Life Financial Inc.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SLF($31.6B) has a higher market cap than FIHL($2.26B). SLF has higher P/E ratio than FIHL: SLF (13.86) vs FIHL (1.03). FIHL YTD gains are higher at: 45.426 vs. SLF (5.688). SLF has more cash in the bank: 27.5B vs. FIHL (4.01B). FIHL has less debt than SLF: FIHL (448M) vs SLF (13.3B). SLF has higher revenues than FIHL: SLF (32.7B) vs FIHL (3.59B).
FIHLSLFFIHL / SLF
Capitalization2.26B31.6B7%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD45.4265.688799%
P/E Ratio1.0313.867%
Revenue3.59B32.7B11%
Total Cash4.01B27.5B15%
Total Debt448M13.3B3%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
SLF: Fundamental Ratings
SLF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
8
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
26
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
59
SMR RATING
1..100
98
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
51
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
54
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FIHLSLF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend about 1 month ago
0%
Bearish Trend about 1 month ago
0%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend about 1 month ago
0%
Bearish Trend about 1 month ago
0%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend about 1 month ago
0%
Bullish Trend about 1 month ago
0%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend about 1 month ago
0%
Bullish Trend about 1 month ago
0%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend about 1 month ago
0%
Bullish Trend about 1 month ago
0%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend about 1 month ago
0%
Bullish Trend about 1 month ago
0%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend about 1 month ago
0%
Bullish Trend about 1 month ago
0%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend about 2 months ago
0%
Bearish Trend about 2 months ago
0%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend about 1 month ago
0%
Bullish Trend about 1 month ago
0%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend about 1 month ago
0%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
FIHL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
SLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GME23.14-0.28
-1.20%
GameStop Corp
TSLA210.60-3.51
-1.64%
Tesla
SPY552.08-11.60
-2.06%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust
AAPL222.77-6.23
-2.72%
Apple
BTC.X57431.023000-1681.457000
-2.84%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency

FIHL and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FIHL has been loosely correlated with SLF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 34% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FIHL jumps, then SLF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FIHL
1D Price
Change %
FIHL100%
-1.67%
SLF - FIHL
34%
Loosely correlated
+0.53%
AIG - FIHL
33%
Poorly correlated
-1.32%
ORI - FIHL
25%
Poorly correlated
-0.31%
EQH - FIHL
23%
Poorly correlated
-2.75%
IGIC - FIHL
12%
Poorly correlated
-2.06%
More

SLF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SLF has been loosely correlated with AIG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 42% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SLF jumps, then AIG could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SLF
1D Price
Change %
SLF100%
+0.53%
AIG - SLF
42%
Loosely correlated
-1.32%
ESGR - SLF
38%
Loosely correlated
-0.98%
FIHL - SLF
35%
Loosely correlated
-1.67%
ORI - SLF
33%
Poorly correlated
-0.31%
EQH - SLF
24%
Poorly correlated
-2.75%
More