FIGS
Price
$6.93
Change
+$0.09 (+1.32%)
Updated
Aug 15 closing price
Capitalization
1.13B
80 days until earnings call
WWW
Price
$28.71
Change
+$0.23 (+0.81%)
Updated
Aug 15 closing price
Capitalization
2.33B
80 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

FIGS vs WWW

Header iconFIGS vs WWW Comparison
Open Charts FIGS vs WWWBanner chart's image
FIGS
Price$6.93
Change+$0.09 (+1.32%)
Volume$1.58M
Capitalization1.13B
Wolverine World Wide
Price$28.71
Change+$0.23 (+0.81%)
Volume$1.43M
Capitalization2.33B
FIGS vs WWW Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
FIGS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
WWW
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FIGS vs. WWW commentary
Aug 18, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FIGS is a Hold and WWW is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 18, 2025
Stock price -- (FIGS: $6.93 vs. WWW: $28.71)
Brand notoriety: FIGS and WWW are both not notable
FIGS represents the Apparel/Footwear, while WWW is part of the Wholesale Distributors industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FIGS: 72% vs. WWW: 88%
Market capitalization -- FIGS: $1.13B vs. WWW: $2.33B
FIGS [@Apparel/Footwear] is valued at $1.13B. WWW’s [@Wholesale Distributors] market capitalization is $2.33B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Apparel/Footwear] industry ranges from $23.76B to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Wholesale Distributors] industry ranges from $113.68B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Apparel/Footwear] industry is $3.51B. The average market capitalization across the [@Wholesale Distributors] industry is $8.49B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FIGS’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileWWW’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • FIGS’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • WWW’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, WWW is a better buy in the long-term than FIGS.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FIGS’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while WWW’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FIGS’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • WWW’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FIGS is a better buy in the short-term than WWW.

Price Growth

FIGS (@Apparel/Footwear) experienced а +11.41% price change this week, while WWW (@Wholesale Distributors) price change was +3.46% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Apparel/Footwear industry was +4.27%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.78%, and the average quarterly price growth was -5.57%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Wholesale Distributors industry was +3.67%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +11.64%, and the average quarterly price growth was +7.09%.

Reported Earning Dates

FIGS is expected to report earnings on Nov 06, 2025.

WWW is expected to report earnings on Nov 06, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Apparel/Footwear (+4.27% weekly)

Apparel/footwear might be slightly more ‘cyclical’ in the largely non-cyclical category of non-durables. While digital giants like Amazon have been rapidly expanding their presence, traditional clothing/footwear retailers have also been bulking up their online presence in recent years, to milk the burgeoning trend of online shopping among consumers across the globe. The apparel and footwear retail market was valued at around $ 360 billion in 2018, and this figure was expected to reach about $386 billion by 2020 (according to a Statista report). NIKE, Inc, V.F. Corporation and Under Armour, Inc. are some of the companies with the largest U.S. stock market caps in this segment.

@Wholesale Distributors (+3.67% weekly)

Companies in this industry handle the wholesale shipments for the manufacturer of a product. They have warehouses and distribution centers, and they ship products directly to the retailer. Digitization, increasing competition, emerging customer demand, and product innovation are some of shifts that the industry has been facing in recent times – something that is potentially creating needs/opportunities for business model revisions or transformations. Data, analytics, and technology are becoming increasingly important for whole distributors in anticipating and analyzing consumer needs, and therefore planning their business strategies accordingly. Fastenal Company, W.W. Grainger, Inc., Genuine Parts Company and Pool Corporation are some of the largest names in the business.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
WWW($2.33B) has a higher market cap than FIGS($1.13B). FIGS has higher P/E ratio than WWW: FIGS (138.60) vs WWW (27.61). WWW YTD gains are higher at: 31.578 vs. FIGS (11.955). FIGS has less debt than WWW: FIGS (51.3M) vs WWW (860M).
FIGSWWWFIGS / WWW
Capitalization1.13B2.33B48%
EBITDA9.45MN/A-
Gain YTD11.95531.57838%
P/E Ratio138.6027.61502%
Revenue561MN/A-
Total Cash251MN/A-
Total Debt51.3M860M6%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
WWW: Fundamental Ratings
WWW
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
50
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
35
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
78
SMR RATING
1..100
38
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
35
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
47
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FIGSWWW
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
78%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
76%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
83%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
78%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
79%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
88%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
77%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
81%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
74%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 18 days ago
86%
Bearish Trend 18 days ago
77%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
81%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
77%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
77%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FIGS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
WWW
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GQGRX17.250.03
+0.17%
GQG Partners Emerging Markets Equity R6
TRZPX26.86N/A
N/A
T. Rowe Price European Stock Z
DMAGX18.24N/A
N/A
Driehaus Global Fund
CDOFX47.63-0.43
-0.89%
Crawford Small Cap Dividend
NDVAX17.39-0.19
-1.08%
MFS New Discovery Value A

FIGS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FIGS has been loosely correlated with UA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 42% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FIGS jumps, then UA could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FIGS
1D Price
Change %
FIGS100%
+1.32%
UA - FIGS
42%
Loosely correlated
+5.25%
UAA - FIGS
38%
Loosely correlated
+5.08%
SGC - FIGS
37%
Loosely correlated
-0.99%
WWW - FIGS
36%
Loosely correlated
+0.81%
VFC - FIGS
35%
Loosely correlated
+0.93%
More

WWW and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, WWW has been loosely correlated with RL. These tickers have moved in lockstep 62% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if WWW jumps, then RL could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To WWW
1D Price
Change %
WWW100%
+0.81%
RL - WWW
62%
Loosely correlated
+0.08%
UA - WWW
61%
Loosely correlated
+5.25%
SHOO - WWW
59%
Loosely correlated
+1.01%
UAA - WWW
59%
Loosely correlated
+5.08%
VFC - WWW
57%
Loosely correlated
+0.93%
More